...
首页> 外文期刊>Resuscitation. >Optimal timing of coronary intervention in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI): A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Optimal timing of coronary intervention in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI): A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:冠状动脉干预患者冠状动脉干预的最佳定时从心脏骤停的患者没有ST段抬高心肌梗死(NSTEMI):系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective: Performing immediate coronary angiography (CAG) in patients with a cardiac arrest and a non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) remains a highly debated topic. We performed a meta-analysis aiming to evaluate the influence of immediate, delayed, and no CAG in patients with cardiac arrest and NSTEMI. Methods: A comprehensive literature review of Pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase was performed for all studies that compared immediate CAG to delayed or no CAG in the setting of cardiac arrest and NSTEMI. The primary outcome was long-term mortality and secondary outcomes included short-term mortality and a Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) score of 1-2 at the longest follow-up period. A random-effects model was used to report odds ratios (ORs) with Bayesian 95% credible intervals (CrIs), and ORs with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for both network and direct meta-analyses, respectively. Results: 11 studies were included in the final analysis: 8 observational, 1 post-hoc analysis and 2 randomized trials, totaling 3702 patients. The mean age was 63.8 ± 12.8 years with 78% males. We found that immediate and delayed CAG were associated with lower long-term mortality when compared to no CAG (OR 0.21; 95% CrI 0.05-0.82) and (OR 0.11; 95% CrI 0.03-0.43), as well as lower short-term mortality (OR 0.17; 95% CrI 0.04-0.64) and (OR 0.07; 95% CrI 0.01-0.29), respectively. In addition, immediate and delayed CAG were associated with a significantly higher number of patients with a CPC score of 1-2 (OR 4.15; 95% CrI 1.10-16.10) and (OR 4.67; 95% CrI 1.53-15.12), respectively. There were no significant differences between immediate or delayed CAG regarding long-term mortality, short-term mortality, or favorable CPC score. Conclusions: Among patients who survived cardiac arrest with an NSTEMI, CAG is associated with a higher rate of survival and favorable neurological outcomes compared with no CAG. There were no differences between immediate and delayed strategies.
机译:目的:在心脏骤停和非ST-EXTIVATION心肌梗死(NSTEMI)的患者中表演冠状动脉造影(CAG)仍然是一个高度辩论的话题。我们进行了一个旨在评估心脏骤停和Nstemi患者立即,延迟和NO CAG的影响的荟萃分析。方法:对所有研究进行了对PubMed / Medline,Cochrane图书馆和Embase进行了综合文献综述,这些研究将立即CAG与心脏骤停和Nstemi进行延迟或没有消声。主要结果是长期死亡率,二次结果包括短期死亡率和脑绩效类别(CPC)在最长的随访期内为1-2分。随机效应模型用于报告与贝叶斯95%可靠间隔(CIRS)的差异比率(或者),以及395%的置信区间(CIS)分别用于网络和直接荟萃分析。结果:11项研究纳入最终分析:8个观测,1后分析和2例随机试验,总计3702名患者。平均年龄为63.8±12.8岁,男性78%。与No CAG(或0.21; 95%CRI 0.05-0.82)和(或0.11; 95%CRI 0.03-0.43)相比,我们发现立即和延迟的CAG与较低的长期死亡率相关联而低的长期死亡率,以及(或0.11; 95%CRI 0.0.43),以及较低的 - 术语死亡率(或0.17; 95%CRI 0.04-0.64)和(或0.07; 95%CRI 0.01-0.29)。此外,即时和延迟的CAG分别与CPC得分为1-2(或4.15; 95%CRI 1.10-16.10)和(或4.67; 95%CRI 1.53-15.12)的明显增加。关于长期死亡率,短期死亡率或有利的CPC评分之间立即或延迟CAG之间没有显着差异。结论:与NSTemi一起幸存心脏骤停的患者,CAG与没有CAG相比,CAG与较高的存活率和有利的神经原因。即时和延迟策略之间没有差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号