首页> 外文期刊>Raumforschung und Raumordnung >Planning is what planners do? Turning the spotlight onto extra-departmental planning projects
【24h】

Planning is what planners do? Turning the spotlight onto extra-departmental planning projects

机译:规划是规划者吗? 将聚光灯转向额外的部门规划项目

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Publicly funded projects have become popular and omnipresent in urban development. In Germany, both planning funding programs such as “St?dtebauf?rderung” as well as non-planning funding structures have largely increased within the last two decades. These latter funding streams, though not explicitly targeted at planning issues, have a significant impact on municipal planning practices. The increase in funding structures on the European level in particular, has led to the new phenomenon that we have labelled “extra-departmental planning practices”. By presenting two cases of such externally funded planning projects in Berlin, this article reflects on this new phenomenon as a blind spot within the academic planning sphere. We argue that filling this gap is crucial both for planning theory and practice. With regard to planning practice, the article demonstrates that the increase in projects requires stronger administrative coordination, which can hardly be met by municipalities – especially under austerity conditions. A risk is that knowledge generated in these externally funded projects is lost and cannot be drawn on for future municipal projects. With regard to planning theory, the article calls for an open empirical perspective that defines “planning practice” beyond institutional boundaries. The growing practical role of extra-departmental planning practices, described in this article, opposes the idea of a planning theory whose empirical pool is limited to certain institutionally designated actors, instruments or spatial units.
机译:公共资助的项目已成为城市发展中的流行和无所不在。在德国,既规划筹资计划,如“St?dtebauf?rderung”以及未计划的资金结构在过去二十年内主要增加。这些后一种资金流虽然没有明确针对规划问题,但对市政规划做法产生了重大影响。特别是欧洲水平的资金结构的增加导致了我们标记为“额外部门规划实践”的新现象。本文通过介绍两起外部资助规划项目的外部资助规划项目,反映了这一新现象作为学术规划领域的盲点。我们认为,填补这种差距对于规划理论和实践来说至关重要。关于规划实践,本文表明,项目的增加需要更强大的行政协调,这几乎可以由市政当局达到 - 特别是在紧缩条件下。风险是在这些外部资助的项目中产生的知识丢失,无法为未来的市政项目绘制。关于规划理论,文章要求开放的实证视角,定义超出体制边界的“规划实践”。本文中描述的额外部门规划实践的越来越多的实际作用反对了规划理论的思想,其实证池仅限于某些机构指定的演员,仪器或空间单位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号