首页> 外文期刊>Natural resources research >Development Optimization and Uncertainty Analysis Methods for Oil and Gas Reservoirs
【24h】

Development Optimization and Uncertainty Analysis Methods for Oil and Gas Reservoirs

机译:石油和天然气储层的开发优化与不确定性分析方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Uncertainty complicates the development optimization of oil and gas exploration and production projects, but methods have been devised to analyze uncertainty and its impact on optimal decision-making. This paper compares two methods for development optimization and uncertainty analysis: Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and stochastic programming. Two example problems for a gas field development and an oilfield development are solved and discussed to elaborate the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Development optimization involves decisions regarding the configuration of initial capital investment and subsequent operational decisions. Uncertainty analysis involves the quantification of the impact of uncertain parameters on the optimum design concept. The gas field development problem is designed to highlight the differences in the implementation of the two methods and to show that both methods yield the exact same optimum design. The results show that both MC optimization and stochastic programming provide unique benefits, and that the choice of method depends on the goal of the analysis. While the MC method generates more useful information, along with the optimum design configuration, the stochastic programming method is more computationally efficient in determining the optimal solution. Reservoirs comprise multiple compartments and layers with multiphase flow of oil, water, and gas. We present a workflow for development optimization under uncertainty for these reservoirs, and solve an example on the design optimization of a multicompartment, multilayer oilfield development.
机译:不确定性使石油和天然气勘探和生产项目的发展优化复杂化,但已经设计了方法来分析不确定性及其对最佳决策的影响。本文比较了两种开发优化和不确定性分析方法:蒙特卡罗(MC)仿真和随机编程。解决了天然气场开发和油田开发的两个示例问题,并讨论了详细说明了每种方法的优缺点。发展优化涉及关于初始资本投资和随后的业务决策的配置的决定。不确定性分析涉及量化不确定参数对最佳设计理念的影响。气田开发问题旨在突出两种方法实施的差异,并表明两种方法都产生完全相同的最佳设计。结果表明,MC优化和随机编程都提供了独特的好处,并且方法选择取决于分析的目标。虽然MC方法产生更有用的信息,但随着最佳的设计配置,随机编程方法在确定最佳解决方案时更加计算。储存器包括多个隔室和层,具有多相流的油,水和气体。我们为这些水库的不确定性提供了一种开发优化的工作流程,解决了多层油田开发的多层油田的设计优化的一个例子。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号