...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiocarbon >COMPATIBILITY OF ATMOSPHERIC (CO2)-C-14 MEASUREMENTS: COMPARING THE HEIDELBERG LOW-LEVEL COUNTING FACILITY TO INTERNATIONAL ACCELERATOR MASS SPECTROMETRY (AMS) LABORATORIES
【24h】

COMPATIBILITY OF ATMOSPHERIC (CO2)-C-14 MEASUREMENTS: COMPARING THE HEIDELBERG LOW-LEVEL COUNTING FACILITY TO INTERNATIONAL ACCELERATOR MASS SPECTROMETRY (AMS) LABORATORIES

机译:大气(CO2)-C-14测量的兼容性:将海德堡低级计数设施与国际加速器质谱(AMS)实验室进行比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Combining atmospheric Delta(CO2)-C-14 data sets from different networks or laboratories requires secure knowledge on their compatibility. In the present study, we compare Delta(CO2)-C-14 results from the Heidelberg low-level counting (LLC) laboratory to 12 international accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) laboratories using distributed aliquots of five pure CO2 samples. The averaged result of the LLC laboratory has a measurement bias of 0.3 +/- 0.5 parts per thousand with respect to the consensus value of the AMS laboratories for the investigated atmospheric Delta C-14 range of 9.6 to 40.4 parts per thousand. Thus, the LLC measurements on average are not significantly different from the AMS laboratories, and the most likely measurement bias is smaller than the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) interlaboratory compatibility goal for Delta(CO2)-C-14 of 0.5 parts per thousand. The number of intercomparison samples was, however, too small to determine whether the measurement biases of the individual AMS laboratories fulfilled the WMO goal.
机译:组合来自不同网络或实验室的大气中的Delta(CO2)-14数据集需要了解其兼容性的知识。在本研究中,我们使用分布等分试样的五种纯二氧化碳样品,我们比较Δ(二氧化碳)-C-14结果来自海德堡低级计数(LLC)实验室到12个国际加速器质谱(AMS)实验室。 LLC实验室的平均结果对于IMS实验室的AMS实验室的共识价值为0.3 +/- 0.5份‰,对调查的大气ΔC-14范围为9.6至40.4份每千份。因此,平均的LLC测量与AMS实验室没有显着差异,并且最可能的测量偏差小于世界气象组织(WMO)的Δ-1-14‰的世界气象组织(WMO)互联兼容性目标。然而,依比熟类样本的数量太小,无法确定各个AMS实验室的测量偏差是否满足WMO目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号