...
首页> 外文期刊>Resources, Conservation and Recycling >Toward design principles for sound e-waste governance: A research approach illustrated with the case of the Netherlands
【24h】

Toward design principles for sound e-waste governance: A research approach illustrated with the case of the Netherlands

机译:朝着声音电子废物治理的设计原则:荷兰案例所示的研究方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To address the increase in the amount of Waste of Electrical and Electronic Equipment in Europe (WEEE), in 2003 the European Commission issued its WEEE Directive, introducing an extended producer responsibility (EPR). While there is arguably a relationship between modes of e-waste governance and the successful handling of e-waste, the empirical evidence explaining the performance of different modes of e-waste governance is limited. We address this knowledge gap by proposing a framework for analysing and evaluating e-waste governance, inspired by literature on WEEE, reverse logistics and environmental governance. This framework distinguishes between four success conditions that are seen as indicators for the performance of e-waste governance: inclusion of all stakeholders, overall strategic collaboration, an adequate rule system and knowledge sharing/performance management. In addition, the framework distinguishes between different modes of e-waste governance which are assumed to influence the extent to which the success conditions are met. We applied the framework to the case of Dutch e-waste governance to test its usefulness and derive initial lessons and good practices from it. Our findings show that the Dutch e-waste governance arrangement is performing relatively well in terms of meeting the success conditions. We identified some concrete local (pilot) approaches that added an interactive twist to the Dutch e-waste system, which appears to be conducive to the fulfilment of success conditions. These findings suggest that a combination of 'hard' public-private and 'soft' interactive modes of governance combining the strong points of formal rules and voluntary action taking is desirable.
机译:为了解决欧洲电气和电子设备浪费量的增加(WEEE),2003年欧洲委员会发布了其WEEE指令,引入了扩展的制片人责任(EPR)。虽然可以说是电子废物治理模式与电子废物的成功处理之间的关系,但是解释不同模式的电子废物治理表现的实证证据是有限的。我们通过提出分析和评估电子废物治理的框架来解决这一知识差距,这是由WEEE,逆向物流和环境治理的文献的启发。该框架区分了四个成功条件,这些条件被视为履行电子废物治理的指标:包括所有利益攸关方,整体战略合作,充足的规则系统和知识共享/绩效管理。此外,该框架区分了不同模式的电子废物治理,假设存在影响成功条件满足的程度。我们将框架应用于荷兰电子废物治理的案例,以测试其有用性并从中获得初始课程和良好的做法。我们的研究结果表明,荷兰电子废物治理安排在满足成功条件方面表现得比相对良好。我们确定了一些混凝土局部(飞行员)方法,该方法为荷兰电子废物制度添加了交互式扭曲,这似乎有利于实现成功条件。这些调查结果表明,“艰难”公私和“软”互动模式的组合适用于正式规则的强点和自愿行动采取。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号