...
首页> 外文期刊>Resources, Conservation and Recycling >Eco-efficiency assessment of technological innovations in high-grade concrete recycling
【24h】

Eco-efficiency assessment of technological innovations in high-grade concrete recycling

机译:高档混凝土回收技术创新的生态效率评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The increasing volume of Construction and demolition waste (CDW) associated with economic growth is posing challenges to the sustainable management of the built environment. The largest fraction of all the CDW generated in the member states of the European Union (EU) is End-of-life (EOL) concrete. The most widely applied method for EOL concrete recovery in Europe is road base backfilling, which is considered low-grade recovery. The common practice for high-grade recycling is wet process that processes and washes EOL concrete into clean coarse aggregate for concrete manufacturing. It is costly. As a result, a series of EU projects have been launched to advance the technologies for high value-added concrete recycling. A critical environmental and economic evaluation of such technological innovations is important to inform decision making, while there has been a lack of studies in this field. Hence the present study aimed to assess the efficiency of the technical innovations in high-grade concrete recycling, using an improved eco-efficiency analytical approach by integrating life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC). Four systems of high-grade concrete recycling were analyzed for comparison: (i) business-as-usual (BAU) stationary wet processing; (ii) stationary advanced dry recovery (ADR); (iii) mobile ADR; (iv) mobile ADR and Heating Air Classification (A&H). An overarching framework was proposed for LCA/LCC-type eco-efficiency assessment conforming to ISO standards, The study found that technological routes that recycle on-site and produce high-value secondary products are most advantageous. Accordingly, policy recommendations are proposed to support the technological innovations of CDW management.
机译:与经济增长相关的建设和拆迁废物量增加(CDW)对建筑环境的可持续管理构成挑战。欧盟成员国(欧盟)成员国(欧盟)的所有CDW的最大一部分是寿命结束(EOL)混凝土。欧洲EOL混凝土恢复最广泛应用的方法是道路基础回填,被认为是低级恢复。高档再循环的常见做法是湿法,将EOL混凝土用于混凝土制造的清洁粗骨料中。这是昂贵的。因此,已经启动了一系列欧盟项目,以推进高附加值混凝土回收的技术。对这种技术创新的关键环境和经济评估对于告知决策是重要的,而该领域缺乏研究。因此,本研究旨在利用通过整合生命周期评估(LCA)和生命周期成本(LCC)来评估高档混凝土回收中的技术创新技术创新的效率。分析了四种高档混凝土回收系统进行比较:(i)常规(BAU)固定湿法处理; (ii)固定先进的干恢复(ADR); (iii)移动ADR; (iv)移动ADR和加热空气分类(A&H)。研究符合ISO标准的LCA / LCC型生态效率评估提出了总体框架,该研究发现,在现场回收并产生高价值二级产品的技术路线是最有利的。因此,提出了政策建议,以支持CD​​W管理的技术创新。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号