首页> 外文期刊>Resource and energy economics >Designing REDD plus contracts to resolve additionality issues
【24h】

Designing REDD plus contracts to resolve additionality issues

机译:设计Redd Plus合同以解决差额问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To address the issue of potential information asymmetries inherent in the estimation of deforestation baselines required by the current Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation+ (REDD+) scheme, we offer a theoretical analysis of an extended scheme relying on the theory of incentives. We compare two types of contracts: a deforestation based contract and a policy-based contract. Each of them implies a dramatically different information rent/efficiency trade-off due to domestic implementation and transaction costs. If the contract is deforestation-based (resp. policy-based), information rents are awarded to countries with the ex ante lowest (resp. highest) intended deforestation. We show that a general contract can be offered to recipient countries in which the type of instrument proposed is endogenous, independent of the historical trend, unlike the current REDD+ mechanism. Dividing countries into two groups corresponding to the deforestation based instrument and the policy-based instrument helps the donor country to obtain efficient deforestation and avoided deforestation levels. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:为了解决森林砍伐和森林退化+(REDD +)计划所需的森林排放所需的森林砍伐基线估计所固有的潜在信息的问题,我们提供了对依赖激励理论的扩展计划的理论分析。我们比较两种类型的合同:基于森林的合同和基于策略的合同。由于国内实施和交易成本,它们中的每一个都意味着大幅不同的信息租金/效率权衡。如果合同是基于森林砍伐(基于策略的),信息租金被授予EX Ante最低(RESP。最高)预期的砍伐森林的国家。我们表明,与当前的REDD +机制不同,可以向受援国提供一般合同,其中提出的仪器类型是内源性的,与历史趋势不同。将国家分为与基于森林砍伐的仪器相对应的两组,基于策略的仪器有助于捐助国获得有效的森林砍伐,避免森林砍伐级别。 (c)2017 Elsevier B.v.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号