首页> 外文期刊>Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology: RTP >Incremental lifetime cancer risks computed for benzo(a)pyrene and two tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in mainstream cigarette smoke compared with lung cancer risks derived from epidemiologic data.
【24h】

Incremental lifetime cancer risks computed for benzo(a)pyrene and two tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in mainstream cigarette smoke compared with lung cancer risks derived from epidemiologic data.

机译:与源自流行病学数据的肺癌风险相比,在主流卷烟中计算的增量寿命癌症风险和两种烟草特异性N-亚硝胺计算。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The manner in which humans smoke cigarettes is an important determinant of smoking risks. Of the few investigators that have predicted cancer risks from smoking on a chemical-specific basis, most used mainstream cigarette smoke (MCS) carcinogen emissions obtained via machine smoking protocols that only approximate human smoking conditions. Here we use data of Djordjevic et al. [Djordjevic, M.V., Stellman, S.D., Zang, E., 2000. Doses of nicotine and lung carcinogens delivered to cigarette smokers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 92, 106-111] for MCS emissions of three carcinogens measured under human smoking conditions to compute probability distributions of incremental lifetime cancer risk (ILCR) values using Monte Carlo simulations. The three carcinogens considered are benzo[a]pyrene, N'-nitrosonornicotine (NNN), and 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK). Computed NNK ILCR values were compared with lifetime risks of lung cancer (ILCR(CMD)(obsSigma-lung)) derived from American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Studies (CPS) I and II. Within the Monte Carlo simulation results, NNK was responsible for the greatest ILCR values for all cancer endpoints: median ILCR values for NNK were approximately 18-fold and 120-fold higher than medians for NNN and benzo[a]pyrene, respectively. For "regular" cigarettes, the NNK median ILCR for lung cancer was lower than ILCR(CMD)(obsSigma-lung) from CPS-I and II by >90-fold for men and >4-fold for women. Given what is known about chemical carcinogens in MCS, this study shows that there is a higher incidence of lung cancer from exposure to MCS than can be predicted with current risk assessment methods using available toxicity and emission data.
机译:人类烟卷烟的方式是吸烟风险的重要决定因素。在少数预测癌症风险免于对化学特定的基础吸烟的少数研究人员,最常用的主流卷烟烟雾(MCS)通过机器吸烟方案获得的致癌物质排放,只有近似人类吸烟条件。在这里,我们使用djordjevic等的数据。 [Djordjevic,M.v.,Stellman,S.D.,Zang,E.,E.,2000年。尼古丁和肺癌的剂量送到香烟吸烟者。 J. Natl。癌症inst。 92,106-111]对于在人类吸烟条件下测量的三种致癌物质的MCS排放,以计算使用Monte Carlo模拟计算增量寿命癌症风险(ILCR)值的概率分布。考虑的三种致癌物质是苯并[a]芘,n'-硝基甲腺嘌呤(nnn)和4-(甲基亚氨基氨基)-1-(3-吡啶基)-1-丁酮(NNK)。将计算的NNK ILCR值与肺癌的寿命风险进行比较(ILCR(CMD)(Obssigma-Lung))衍生自美洲癌症会预防研究(CPS)I和II。在蒙特卡罗仿真结果中,NNK负责所有癌症终点的最大ILCR值:NNK的中位ILCR值分别比NNN和苯并[A]芘的中位数高约18倍。对于“常规”卷烟,肺癌的NNK中值ILCR低于来自CPS-I和II的ILCR(CMD)(橙色肺),由> 90倍的男性和妇女4倍。鉴于MCS中的化学致癌物质所知,该研究表明,肺癌暴露于MCS的发病率高于使用可用毒性和排放数据的当前风险评估方法可以预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号