...
首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >The effects of physical activity facilities on vigorous physical activity in gated and non-gated neighborhoods
【24h】

The effects of physical activity facilities on vigorous physical activity in gated and non-gated neighborhoods

机译:物理活动设施对门控和非门控社区剧烈体力活动的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Physical activity is important for health and it is believed that the availability of physical activity facilities (PAF) within the neighborhood encourages physical activity, especially vigorous physical activity (VPA). The main purpose of providing PAF, particularly in gated neighborhoods, is to encourage physical activity. However, there are few studies that investigate the differences of PAF in gated and non-gated neighborhoods and the effect of providing PAF on VPA in developing countries. Therefore, the objectives of this study are to compare PAF and VPA in gated and non-gated neighborhoods and to investigate the association between PAF and VPA in developing countries with special reference to Karachi, Pakistan. A subjective method (IPAQ-Short) was used to calculate VPA in a week (n = 1042 adults), while PAF was measured through aerial maps and ground observations within 1 km(2) areas of gated and non-gated neighborhoods. An independent sample t-test was used to compare PAF and VPA in gated and non-gated neighborhoods, whereas Gama tests were used to investigate the association of PAF with VPA. Results show that PAF and VPA are significantly higher in gated neighborhoods than non-gated neighborhoods. The results also show that 42.3% of people get 600 MET-minutes in a week if the number of PAF is 6 in a 1 km(2) neighborhood area. It can be concluded that future neighborhoods should have an appropriate number of PAF for making residents as physically active as possible.
机译:身体活动对于健康很重要,据信邻里内的身体活动设施(PAF)的可用性鼓励体力活动,特别是剧烈的身体活动(VPA)。提供PAF,特别是在门控社区的主要目的是鼓励身体活动。然而,很少有研究调查PAF在门控和非门控社区的差异以及在发展中国家的VPA上提供PAF的效果。因此,本研究的目标是将PAF和VPA进行比较,并在发展中国家的PAF和VPA之间的关联,特别参考卡拉奇,巴基斯坦。主观方法(IPAQ-SHORT)用于在一周内计算VPA(n = 1042个成人),而PAF通过在门控和非门控社区的1公里(2)区域内通过航空地图和地面观察来测量。独立的样品T检验用于比较门控和非门控社区的PAF和VPA,而GAMA测试用于研究PAF与VPA的关联。结果表明,在门控社区的PAF和VPA比非门控社区显着高。结果还表明,42.3%的人得到&如果PAF的数量是& 6在1公里(2)邻居区域。可以得出结论,未来的社区应该有适当数量的PAF,使居民尽可能地活跃。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号