首页> 外文期刊>Land Use Policy >Coordinating invasive plant management among conservation and rural stakeholders
【24h】

Coordinating invasive plant management among conservation and rural stakeholders

机译:在保护和农村利益攸关方之间协调侵入性植物管理

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Collective action among conservation and rural land managers is required to protect natural and rural ecosystems from the spread of invasive plants. Achieving such tenure-blind collective action is a considerable policy challenge and social research on this topic is in its infancy, is rural-focused and rarely addresses multiple species concurrently. This study explores the nature and extent of collective action among conservation and rural stakeholders managing multiple invasive plant species in south-west Alberta, Canada. Thirty telephone interviews were conducted with staff of national and provincial parks, non-government organisations and government agencies, as well as ranchers and consultants operating within the Oldman Watershed. The results showed three key types of collective action participatory, linked and collaborative occurring across the landscape. Collaborative invasive plant management (IPM) was the most likely to bring rural and conservation land managers together to address multiple species but was highly resource intensive and confined to public lands. A polycentric system of governance may enable landscape-wide IPM to be achieved if it can link existing collaborative efforts as well as establish and maintain new relationships among rural and conservation stakeholders. Organisations that encompass multiple land uses, such as watershed councils and municipal districts, may be best placed to bring diverse stakeholders together to develop a shared plan, facilitate social learning and demonstrate on-ground action at multiple scales across land uses.
机译:保护和农村土地管理人员之间的集体行为是保护自然和农村生态系统免受侵入性植物的传播。实现此类任期盲目的集体行动是一项相当大的政策挑战,对这一话题的社会研究是在其初期的阶段,是众所周期以来的,并且很少同时处理多种物种。本研究探讨了加拿大西南部管理多种侵入性植物物种的保护和农村利益攸关方之间的性质和程度。三十个电话采访是与国家和省级公园,非政府组织和政府机构的工作人员进行的,以及在沙漠中的牧场主和顾问。结果表明,在整个景观中发生了三种关键类型的集体行动,联系和协作。合作侵入性植物管理(IPM)最有可能将农村和保护土地管理人员共同地满足多种物种,但却是高度资源密集,局限于公共土地。如果可以将现有的协作努力链接以及建立和维持农村和保护利益相关者之间的建立和维持新的关系,可以实现景观范围的IPM。包含多种土地用途的组织,例如流域议会和市区,可能最好地将不同的利益相关者共同制定共享计划,促进社会学习,并在土地使用的多种尺度上展示了在地面行动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号