首页> 外文期刊>NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences >Supporting local institutions for inclusive green growth: Developing an Evidence Gap Map
【24h】

Supporting local institutions for inclusive green growth: Developing an Evidence Gap Map

机译:支持本地机构的包容性绿色增长:制定证据差距地图

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We conduct a structured search of the academic literature that assesses the impact of development interventions that aim to build and strengthen local-level institutions to facilitate Inclusive Green Growth. Inclusive Green Growth extends the standardgrowth perspective to include welfare enhancements both the poor (‘inclusive’) and for future (‘green’) generations. We restrict our search to studies in the domain of agriculture and poverty alleviation in the developing world. We access ten onlinedatabases and various working paper series and focus on summarising evidence from quantitative studies that use rigorous evaluation methods. Together, this yields 158 studies. We then retain 66 studies that contain a credible counterfactual. We visualize the interventions and outcomes in an Evidence Gap Map, highlighting both the available evidence and remaining knowledge gaps. Most studies suggest that strengthening local institutions can improve the delivery and targeting of public services and overall satisfaction with local governance. There are however, clear limitations and knowledge gaps highlighting priorities for future work. Few studies assess impacts on final outcomes such as household income or agricultural productivity and no studies assess inclusive and green outcomes jointly. We discuss the key benefits of a structured literature search and Evidence Gap Map for policy-makers and development practitioners and illustrate how it serves as a knowledge repository and identifies where evidence is lacking, thus setting the agenda for future work.
机译:我们对学术文献进行了结构性搜索,评估了开发干预的影响,旨在建立和加强当地级机构以促进包容性绿色增长。包容性绿色成长延长了标准的透视,包括福利增强穷人(“包容性”)和未来('绿色')代。我们限制了我们在发展中国家农业和扶贫领域的研究。我们访问十个onlinedatabases和各种工作纸系列,并专注于总结使用严格评估方法的定量研究的证据。在一起,这产生了158项研究。然后,我们保留66项含有可信的反事实的研究。我们可视化证据差距地图中的干预措施和结果,突出了可用的证据和剩余知识差距。大多数研究表明,加强当地机构可以改善公共服务的交付和定位,以及与地方治理的整体满意度。然而,有明确的限制和知识差距突出了未来工作的优先事项。很少有研究评估家庭收入或农业生产力等最终结果的影响,也没有研究共同评估包容性和绿色成果。我们讨论了结构化文献搜索和证据缺口地图的主要优势,以获得政策制定者和发展从业者,并说明它是如何作为知识库,并确定证据缺乏证据的地方,从而设立了未来工作的议程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号