More than a cultural experience: Assessing the impact of a medical-surgical international clinical on nursing students' academic performance

摘要

A review of the extant literature suggests that there remains a dearth of evidence regarding the evaluation of well-defined outcomes related to international nursing clinical experiences. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between students' clinical experience (traditional versus international) and a number of academic outcomes including final medical-surgical course grades, performance on relevant Assessment Technologies Institute (ATI) proctored exams, and National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX) pass rates. A non-experimental design was implemented using retrospective data obtained from a small university in the Midwest. Students complete a medical-surgical clinical in India during the interim of their third semester in the nursing program. Results of the t-tests show a statistically significant difference in final grades for Adult Health II theory when comparing students who completed a traditional clinical (M = 83.1, SD = 3.8) with those who completed an international clinical (M = 81.6, SD = 5.2); t(100) = 2.0, p = .043. The difference in mean scores for traditional clinical students (M = 70.3, SD = 6.6) versus international clinical students (M = 66.2, SD = 7.2) for the Adult Medical-Surgical proctored exam reached statistical significance, t(119) = 4.5, p <= .001. In contrast, there was no significant difference in means scores between the two groups with regard to scores on the Comprehensive Predictor proctored exam (traditional clinical, M = 76.1, SD = 5.9; international clinical, M = 75.2, SD = 6.4); t(121) = 1.0, p = .316. Finally, a chi square test of independence found that the relationship between clinical status and performance on NCLEX was not statistically significant, chi(2) (1, N = 197) = 0.132, p = .716. Further research is needed to examine the impact of international clinicals on a broader range of outcomes including academic, cultural competency, and clinical performance measures.