首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Task-related and resting-state fMRI identify distinct networks that preferentially support remembering the past and imagining the future
【24h】

Task-related and resting-state fMRI identify distinct networks that preferentially support remembering the past and imagining the future

机译:任务相关和休息状态FMRI确定了优先支持记住过去和想象未来的不同网络

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The relation between episodic memory and episodic future thought (EFT) remains an active target of research. A growing literature suggests that similar cognitive processes and neural substrates tend to support these acts. However, direct comparisons of whole-brain activity reveal clear differences, with numerous regions more active when engaging in EFT than when remembering, and a smaller collection of regions displaying the opposite pattern of activity. Although various network labels have been applied to prior neuroimaging results, to date no formal resting-state functional connectivity analysis has been conducted. In the current experiment, 48 subjects remembered events from their past and engaged in EFT. Resting-state data were collected from all subjects. Task results replicated recent findings, with more activity during EFT in regions across frontal and parietal cortex, and with more activity during remembering in a smaller number of predominantly parahippocampal and retrosplenial regions. Resting-state connectivity analysis, based on seed locations defined using the fMRI task data, indicated that regions preferentially activated during EFT fell primarily within the default mode network, while those more active during remembering fell primarily within the contextual association network. These results suggest that despite their general similarity, the functional network membership of regions showing task differences is dissociable. We discuss our results in light of several hypotheses that attempt to relate remembering and EFT, and suggest that the data speak to differences in the relative contributions of episodic and semantic memory, as well as controlled and automatic processing, during the acts of remembering or engaging in EFT.
机译:焦虑记忆与兴高学未来思想(EFT)之间的关系仍然是研究的积极目标。一种日益增长的文献表明,类似的认知过程和神经基材倾向于支持这些作用。然而,全脑活动的直接比较揭示了明显的差异,许多区域在从记忆时比记住时更加活跃,以及显示相反活动模式的较小区域。虽然各种网络标签已经应用于先前的神经影像成果,但迄今为止,没有进行正式的休息状态功能连接分析。在目前的实验中,48名科目从过去的事件记住并从事EFT。从所有受试者收集休息状态数据。任务结果复制了最近的发现,在跨前和顶叶皮质的区域内的EFT期间有更多的活动,并且在较少数量的主要的Parahippopapal和retroplenial区域记住期间的活动。基于使用FMRI任务数据定义的种子位置的休息状态连接分析表明,在EFT期间优先激活的区域主要在默认模式网络内下降,而在记住期间的那些更活跃的过程主要在上下文关联网络中下降。这些结果表明,尽管它们的一般性相似,但显示任务差异的区域的功能网络成员是可解释的。我们鉴于几个假设,试图与记住和EFT相关的几个假设讨论我们的结果,并表明数据在记忆或参与的行为期间与情节和语义记忆的相对贡献以及控制和自动处理的差异在EFT中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号