首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Component deficits of visual neglect: “Magnetic” attraction of attention vs. impaired spatial working memory
【24h】

Component deficits of visual neglect: “Magnetic” attraction of attention vs. impaired spatial working memory

机译:视觉忽视的组件缺陷:“磁性”引起的注意力与空间工作记忆受损

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Visual neglect is a disabling consequence of right hemisphere damage, whereby patients fail to detect left-sided objects. Its precise mechanisms are debated, but there is some consensus that distinct component deficits may variously associate and interact in different patients. Here we used a touch-screen based procedure to study two putative component deficits of neglect, rightward "magnetic" attraction of attention and impaired spatial working memory, in a group of 47 right brain-damaged patients, of whom 33 had signs of left neglect. Patients performed a visual search task on three distinct conditions, whereby touched targets could (1) be tagged, (2) disappear or (3) show no change. Magnetic attraction of attention was defined as more left neglect on the tag condition than on the disappear condition, where right-sided disappeared targets could not capture patients' attention. Impaired spatial working memory should instead produce more neglect on the no change condition, where no external cue indicated that a target had already been explored, than on the tag condition. Using a specifically developed analysis algorithm, we identified significant differences of performance between the critical conditions. Neglect patients as a group performed better on the disappear condition than on the no change condition and also better in the tag condition comparing with the no change condition. No difference was found between the tag condition and the disappear condition. Some of our neglect patients had dissociated patterns of performance, with predominant magnetic attraction or impaired spatial working memory. Anatomical results issued from both grey matter analysis and fiber tracking were consistent with the typical patterns of fronto-parietal and occipito-frontal disconnection in neglect, but did not identify lesional patterns specifically associated with one or another deficit, thus suggesting the possible co-localization of attentional and working memory processes in fronto-parietal networks. These findings give support to the hypothesis of the co-occurrence of distinct cognitive deficits in visual neglect and stress the necessity of multi-component models of visuospatial disorders. Highlights ? We studied magnetic attraction of attention and spatial working memory in visual neglect. ? A specific analysis algorithm identified specific neglect profiles. ? Both deficits were associated with fronto-parietal network damage. ? Multi-component models of visuospatial disorders are needed to explain visual neglect.
机译:摘要视觉忽视是右半球损坏的禁用后果,由此患者未能检测左侧物体。其精确的机制是讨论的,但有一些共识,即不同的组件缺陷可能在不同患者中各种缔合和互动。在这里,我们使用了基于触摸屏的程序来研究忽视的两个推定组件缺陷,右向“磁性”吸引力和空间工作记忆受损,其中33名右脑损坏的患者中的一组滞留患者。患者在三个不同的条件下进行了视觉搜索任务,由此触摸目标可以(1)被标记,(2)消失或(3)显示没有变化。关注的磁吸引被定义为标签条件的疏忽比消失条件更忽略,右侧消失的目标无法捕捉患者的注意力。空间工作记忆受损应在没有变化条件下产生更多的忽视,其中没有外部提示表明已经探索了目标,而不是标签条件。使用专门开发的分析算法,我们在临界条件之间确定了性能的显着差异。忽视患者作为一个小组在消失条件下表现更好,而不是在没有变化条件下更好地与没有变化条件比较。在标签条件和消失状态之间没有发现差异。我们的一些忽视患者已经解开了性能模式,具有主要的磁力吸引力或空间工作记忆受损。从灰色物质分析和纤维跟踪发出的解剖结果与忽视的典型图案和垂耳道的典型模式一致,但没有识别与一个或另一个赤字有关的损益模式,从而提出可能的共同定位前景网络中的注意力和工作记忆流程。这些调查结果支持视觉疏忽中不同认知缺陷的共同发生的假设,并强调粘合性疾病多组分模型的必要性。强调 ?我们在视觉忽略中研究了关注的磁吸引力和空间工作记忆。还特定的分析算法识别特定的忽略简档。还这两种缺陷都与前景网络损坏有关。还需要多组分模型来解释视觉忽视。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号