...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychologia >Does the min-counting strategy for simple addition become automatized in educated adults? A behavioural and ERP study of the size congruency effect
【24h】

Does the min-counting strategy for simple addition become automatized in educated adults? A behavioural and ERP study of the size congruency effect

机译:简单添加的最小计数策略是否在受过良好教育的成年人中自动化? 大小一致效应的行为和ERP研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Recent studies have proposed that the sum-counting strategy for simple addition (i.e., count up of the summed value of the two operands one by one) used at early age becomes automatized in adults, challenging the long held view that skilled adults solve simple addition problems by fact retrieval. As arithmetic skill develops, however, the sum-counting strategy usually is replaced by a more advanced and efficient min-counting strategy (i.e., start counting at the value of the larger addend and count up by ones equal to the smaller or "min" addend). Thus, one would expect the min strategy, rather than the sum strategy, to become automatized if we assume automatic counting procedures exist. The present study sought evidence of the min-strategy in adults by investigating the size congruency effect (SCE) through behavioural and event related brain potential (ERP) experiments. The SCE is observed in number comparison tasks (e.g., identify the larger of two numbers), where RT is slower when the physical and numerical size of the numbers are incongruent compared to when they are congruent. The min-counting strategy inherently requires a number comparison stage, because the min and max number must be determined before the counting begins. Experiment 1 tested 72 participants on addition and number comparison tasks. The results showed a robust behavioural SCE for number comparison but not for simple addition. Experiment 2 tested 20 participants with a large number of addition and number comparison problems and recorded ERP. The behavioural results replicated the findings of Experiment 1. The ERP results revealed brain signatures in line with previous studies and the current behavioural findings. No SCE indicated the absence of a number comparison stage for addition; thus, the present findings ruled out the possibility of a fast min-counting strategy, or more generally a min strategy, for adults' simple addition.
机译:最近的研究提出了简单添加的总和计数策略(即,在休假期间使用的简单附加(即,计算的两个操作数的总和)在成人中自动化,挑战熟练的成年人解决简单的添加事实检索问题。然而,随着算术技能的发展,总和计数策略通常被更高级和高效的最小计数策略所取代(即,在较大的附加的值下开始计数,并且由等于较小或“min的值计算附加物)。因此,如果我们假设存在自动计数程序,可以预期最小的策略而不是总和策略。本研究通过采用行为和事件相关的大脑潜力(ERP)实验来研究成年人的初始策略的证据。在数量比较任务(例如,识别两个数字的较大数量)中观察到SCE,其中RT比当它们是一致时的数量的物理和数值尺寸不一致时较慢。最小计数策略本身需要数字比较阶段,因为必须在计数开始之前确定最小值和最大号码。实验1在添加和数字比较任务中测试了72名参与者。结果表明,用于数量比较的强大行为SCE,但不是简单的添加。实验2测试了20名参与者,大量添加和数字比较问题并记录了ERP。行为结果复制了实验1. ERP结果透露脑签名与先前的研究和当前的行为发现。没有SCE表明没有添加数字比较阶段;因此,本研究结果规定了成年人简单的成人的快速计数策略,或者更普遍策略的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号