首页> 外文期刊>Neurodegenerative disease management >Pain assessment tools for older adults with dementia in long-term care facilities: a systematic review
【24h】

Pain assessment tools for older adults with dementia in long-term care facilities: a systematic review

机译:长期护理设施痴呆症的老年人疼痛评估工具:系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Aim: The aim of this review is to document pain assessment tools used primarily for older adults in long-term care facilities and compare self-report and observer-rated tools. Methods: A literature search was conducted in Ovid MEDLINE?, Embase, Cochrane and PsydNFO. ^g> included 'dementia', 'pain management' and 'managing pain'. Results: Of 1033 references, 23 articles were selected for inclusion. Six tools were self-rated and 18 tools were administered by an observer. 13 studies evaluated the reliability/validity of their scales; four studies compared different scales against each other. Conclusion: Self-report should be the first-line approach when possible, with observational assessment used as a supplementary tool. Reliable observational tools have been shortened, and shown to maintain high reliability/validity, and positive psychometric properties.
机译:目的:本综述的目的是记录主要为长期护理设施中老年人使用的疼痛评估工具,并比较自我报告和观察者级的工具。 方法:在Ovid Medline的情况下进行文献搜索?,Embase,Cochrane和Psydnfo。 ^ g>包括“痴呆症”,“疼痛管理”和“痛苦”。 结果:1033参考文献,选择了23篇文章纳入。 六个工具是自评估的,观察者管理18个工具。 13研究评估了尺度的可靠性/有效性; 四项研究与彼此相比不同的鳞片。 结论:自我报告应尽可能是一线方法,观察评估用作补充工具。 可靠的观察工具已缩短,并显示为保持高可靠性/有效性和正常的心理测量性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号