...
首页> 外文期刊>Aesthetic plastic surgery >Nasal strips for evaluating and classifying valvular nasal obstruction.
【24h】

Nasal strips for evaluating and classifying valvular nasal obstruction.

机译:用于评估和分类瓣膜鼻塞的鼻贴。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: A normal-appearing upper lateral cartilage (ULC) or lower lateral cartilage (LLC) may be functionally abnormal. The Cottle sign estimates obstruction but not its exact location. A test is needed that evaluates the ULC and LLC separately. METHODS: The study included 30 patients with airway obstruction symptoms and signs referable only to the nasal valves. They received a Cottle test and a Breathe-Rite nasal strip to the middle third of the nose and again to the lower third (the rims). The patients were asked whether the strip made their inspiration better, worse, or no different and classified as BR 0 (no airway obstruction due to ULC/LLC dysfunction), BR I (improvement with the strip on the ULC), BR II (improvement with the strip on the LLC), or BR III (improvement with strips on both the ULC and the LLC, independently). All the patients underwent surgery involving spreader grafts, lateral crural struts, suture techniques, and the like. Correlations were sought between the BR classification, Cottle sign, and physical integrity of the ULC/LLC. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients required internal valve correction, whereas 8 required external valve correction, and 10 required correction of both. The Cottle test was nonspecific because most patients in all the groups exhibited a positive Cottle. However, the BR classification was specific, correlating with functional outcomes for 27 of the 30 patients. The McNemar test showed a significant correlation (Chi(2) = 9.09091; P = 0.00257) between physical finding and BR score. CONCLUSIONS: Inspiratory nasal function (related to ULC/LLC cartilages) is easily classified using nasal strips. The BR test is more specific and powerful than the Cottle test.
机译:背景:正常出现的上侧软骨(ULC)或下侧软骨(LLC)可能在功能上异常。科特勒号估计障碍物,但不是其确切位置。需要进行单独评估ULC和LLC的测试。方法:该研究纳入了30例仅涉及鼻瓣的气道阻塞症状和体征。他们接受了Cottle测试,并在鼻中部和鼻中部的下三分之一(边缘)接受了Breathe-Rite鼻贴。询问患者试纸条是否使他们的吸气更好,更差或没有不同,并分类为BR 0(由于ULC / LLC功能障碍而没有气道阻塞),BR I(对ULC试纸条进行改善),BR II(改善)或BR III(分别改进ULC和LLC上的带)。所有患者都进行了手术,包括扩张器移植物,侧向外侧支柱,缝合技术等。在BR分类,Cottle符号和ULC / LLC的物理完整性之间寻求相关性。结果:总共12例患者需要内部瓣膜矫正,而8例需要外部瓣膜矫正,而10例都需要两者矫正。 Cottle测试是非特异性的,因为所有组中的大多数患者均显示阳性Cottle。但是,BR分类是特定的,与30例患者中的27例的功能结果相关。 McNemar测试显示物理发现与BR评分之间存在显着相关性(Chi(2)= 9.09091; P = 0.00257)。结论:吸鼻功能(与ULC / LLC软骨有关)很容易使用鼻贴进行分类。 BR测试比Cottle测试更加具体和强大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号