首页> 外文期刊>Aesthetic plastic surgery >Use of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate together with a self-adhering mesh (Dermabond? Prineo?) for skin closure following abdominoplasty: An open, prospective, controlled, randomized, clinical study
【24h】

Use of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate together with a self-adhering mesh (Dermabond? Prineo?) for skin closure following abdominoplasty: An open, prospective, controlled, randomized, clinical study

机译:氰基丙烯酸2-辛酯与自粘网眼(Dermabond?Prineo?)一起用于腹部成形术后皮肤闭合的研究:一项开放,前瞻性,对照,随机,临床研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Abdominoplasty is one of the most commonly performed procedures in plastic surgery. The appearance of the scar is a major factor that contributes to the aesthetic outcome of the procedure and depends largely on the technique of wound closure. The new Prineo? wound closure system was introduced to combine the effectiveness of 2-octyl cyanoacrylate (Dermabond?) together with a self-adhering mesh. Methods: Fifty-two women and eight men aged between 21 and 65 years who were scheduled for abdominoplasty were included in the study. The total operating times after abdominoplasty of the traditional wound closure technique and the Prineo?-type wound closure technique were compared. Furthermore, an analysis comparing the cost of the two methods was performed. Two weeks after surgery the wounds were examined and graded using the Hollander Cosmesis Scale. At the 6- and 12-month follow-ups, the aesthetic outcome of the abdominal scar was evaluated using the Vancouver Scar Scale. Twelve months after surgery, the patients were asked to answer their part of the Patient Scar Assessment Scale. Results: The mean total operating time for the new skin closure system was statistically significantly shorter than that of intradermal sutures. The mean price difference per patient was 104.27? (134.79$) in favor of Prineo?. The Hollander Cosmesis Scale indicated a significantly more favorable overall result with Prineo? at 2 weeks after surgery. The Vancouver Scar Scale demonstrated a better cosmetic outcome in favor of Prineo? 6 and 12 months after surgery. The Patient Scar Assessment Scale scores 12 months after surgery indicated that the patients noted significantly less pain, thickness, and irregularity with Prineo?. Conclusion: Based on our results, we conclude that Prineo? is a safe and effective substitute for superficial skin closure, with good cosmetic results and no increase in wound complications. The use of Prineo? decreases operative time and cost and enhances the patient's postoperative comfort. Level of Evidence I: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
机译:背景:腹部整形术是整形外科中最常用的手术之一。疤痕的出现是影响手术效果的主要因素,在很大程度上取决于伤口闭合技术。新的Prineo?引入了伤口闭合系统,将氰基丙烯酸2-辛酯(Dermabond?)的功效与自粘网片结合起来。方法:本研究包括52名年龄在21至65岁之间的计划进行腹部成形术的女性和8名男性。比较了传统伤口闭合技术和Prineo?型伤口闭合技术在腹部整形后的总手术时间。此外,进行了比较两种方法成本的分析。手术两周后,使用Hollander Cosmesis量表对伤口进行检查和分级。在6个月和12个月的随访中,使用Vancouver Scar Scale评估了腹部疤痕的美学效果。手术十二个月后,要求患者回答患者疤痕评估量表的部分内容。结果:新的皮肤闭合系统的平均总手术时间在统计学上明显短于皮内缝合。每位患者的平均价格差为104.27? (134.79 $)支持Prineo?。霍兰德美容化妆品量表显示,使用Prineo?的总体结果明显更好。在手术后2周。温哥华疤痕量表显示出更好的美容效果,有利于Prineo?术后6个月和12个月。手术后12个月的患者疤痕评估量表评分表明,患者注意到Prineo?的疼痛,厚度和不规则症明显减少。结论:根据我们的结果,我们得出结论认为Prineo?是一种安全有效的替代方法,可用于浅表皮肤闭合,具有良好的美容效果,并且不会增加伤口并发症。使用Prineo?减少了手术时间和成本,并提高了患者的术后舒适度。证据级别I:该期刊要求作者为每篇文章分配一个证据级别。有关这些循证医学等级的完整说明,请参阅目录或在线作者须知www.springer.com/00266。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号