...
首页> 外文期刊>Addictive behaviors >Can persons with a history of multiple addiction treatment episodes benefit from technology delivered behavior therapy? A moderating role of treatment history at baseline
【24h】

Can persons with a history of multiple addiction treatment episodes benefit from technology delivered behavior therapy? A moderating role of treatment history at baseline

机译:具有多种成瘾治疗史的人能否从技术提供的行为疗法中受益?基线治疗史的适度作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A growing line of research has shown positive treatment outcomes from technology-based therapy for substance use disorders (SUDs). However, little is known about the effectiveness of technology-based SUD interventions for persons who already had numerous prior SUD treatments. We conducted a secondary analysis on a 12-month trial with patients (N = 160) entering methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). Patients were randomly assigned to either standard MMT treatment or a model in which half of standard counseling sessions were replaced with a computer-based intervention, called Therapeutic Education System (standard + TES). Four treatment history factors at baseline, the number of lifetime SUD treatment episodes, detoxification episodes, and inpatient/outpatient treatment episodes were categorized into three levels based on their tertile points, and analyzed as moderators. Dependent variables were urine toxicology results for opioid and cocaine abstinence for 52-weeks. The standard + TES condition produced significantly better opioid abstinence than standard treatment for participants with 1) a moderate or high frequency of lifetime SUD treatment episodes, and 2) those with all three levels (low, moderate and high) of detoxification and inpatient/outpatient treatment episodes, ps < .01. The standard + TES condition enhanced cocaine abstinence compared to standard treatment among people with 1) a moderate or high frequency of lifetime SUD treatment episodes, 2) a high level of detoxification episodes, and 3) a moderate or high level of inpatient treatment history, ps < .01. We found that including technology based behavioral therapy as part of treatment can be more effective than MMT alone, even among patients with a history of multiple addiction treatment episodes. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:越来越多的研究表明,基于技术的药物滥用障碍(SUD)治疗的积极治疗效果。但是,对于已经接受过许多SUD治疗的患者,基于技术的SUD干预的有效性知之甚少。我们对接受美沙酮维持治疗(MMT)的患者(N = 160)进行了为期12个月的试验,进行了次要分析。将患者随机分配到标准MMT治疗或模型中,在该模型中,一半的标准咨询课程被替换为基于计算机的干预方法,称为治疗教育系统(标准+ TES)。根据基线的四个治疗史因素,SUD终生治疗发作次数,排毒发作和住院/门诊治疗发作次数,根据其三分点将其分为三个级别,并作为主持人进行分析。因变量是阿片类药物和可卡因戒断52周的尿毒理学结果。对于以下情况的参与者,标准+ TES状况比标准治疗产生的阿片类药物戒断要好得多:1)一生中的SUD治疗发作频率中等或高,2)排毒和住院/门诊三个级别(低,中和高)治疗发作,ps <0.01。与以下情况的标准治疗相比,标准+ TES条件可卡因的禁欲提高了:1)中度或高频率的终生SUD治疗发作; 2)高水平的排毒发作; 3)中度或高水平住院治疗史, ps <0.01。我们发现,即使在有多次成瘾治疗史的患者中,将基于技术的行为疗法作为治疗的一部分也比单独使用MMT更有效。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号