首页> 外文期刊>Addictive behaviors >Pick your poison: Stimuli selection in alcohol-related implicit measures
【24h】

Pick your poison: Stimuli selection in alcohol-related implicit measures

机译:选择你的毒药:酒精相关隐性措施中的刺激选择

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It is common for people to report strong preferences for certain types of alcohol, often as a function of past positive or negative experiences with particular types of drinks. Despite this individual difference, implicit measures related to alcohol frequently use nomothetic approaches - i.e., use a standard set of alcohol beverage stimuli - which may not match individuals' actual drinking behavior. Moreover, this mismatch may account for some of the inconsistencies across studies using implicit measures. The present study used an idiographic variant of the Implicit Association Test (IAT) in which participants (N= 300) selected alcohol images that matched their drinking behavior (non-drinkers selected what they were offered most often). Results were consistent with previous research on alcohol preference: women selected more liquor and wine images, men selected more beer images; heavy episodic drinkers selected more beer and liquor images and selected fewer wine images than lighter drinkers and non-drinkers. In addition, IAT scores were sensitive to drinking levels in the expected direction and, importantly, were robust to stimuli selected. Thus, results provide initial validation of idiographic approaches to stimuli selection.
机译:人们通常会报告对某些类型的酒精有强烈的偏爱,这通常是由于过去对特定类型的饮料的正面或负面经验的影响。尽管存在个体差异,但与酒精有关的隐性测量经常使用非自然方法-即使用一组标准的酒精饮料刺激-可能与个人的实际饮酒行为不符。此外,这种不匹配可能会导致使用隐性测度的研究之间存在一些不一致之处。本研究使用了隐式联想测验(IAT)的独特形式,其中参与者(N = 300)选择与他们的饮酒行为相匹配的酒精图像(非饮酒者选择最常提供的酒精饮料)。结果与先前关于酒精偏好的研究一致:女性选择了更多的酒和葡萄酒图片,男性选择了更多的啤酒图片;与轻度饮酒者和非饮酒者相比,重度情景饮酒者选择了更多的啤酒和白酒图像,并选择了较少的葡萄酒图像。此外,IAT分数对预期方向上的饮酒水平敏感,重要的是,对选择的刺激物有较强的抵抗力。因此,结果提供了独特方法对刺激选择的初步验证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号