首页> 外文期刊>Kybernetes: The International Journal of Systems & Cybernetics >Applying ethics to itself: recursive ethical questioning in architecture and second-order cybernetics
【24h】

Applying ethics to itself: recursive ethical questioning in architecture and second-order cybernetics

机译:将道德应用于本身:在架构和二阶争论网络中递归道德质疑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to put forward a way that ethics may be applied recursively to itself, in the sense that how we speak and reason about ethics is an activity to which ethical considerations and questions apply. Design/methodology/approach The paper is built on parallels between design and cybernetics, integrating elements of ethical discourse in each field. The way that cybernetics and design can each act as their own meta-disciplines, in the design of design and the cybernetics of cybernetics, is used as a pattern for a similarly recursive approach to ethics. This is explored further by drawing parallels between Heinz von Foersters' criticism of moral codes and concerns about paternalism in designing architecture. Findings Designers incorporate implicit ethical questioning as part of the recursive process through which they design their design activity, moving between conversations that pursue the goals of a project and meta-conversations in which they question which goals to pursue and the methods they employ in doing so. Given parallels between designing architecture and setting out an ethics (both of which put forward ways in which others are to live), a similar approach may be taken within ethical discourse, folding ethics within itself as its own meta-discipline. Originality/value The paper provides a framework in which to address ethical considerations within ethical discourse itself. Recursive ethical questioning of this sort offers a way of coping with the incommensurability of values and goals that is commonplace given the fragmented state of contemporary ethics.
机译:目的本文的目的是提出一种方式,即道德可以递归地应用于自己,从而说到我们如何说道德和道德的原因是伦理考虑和问题适用的活动。设计/方法/方法本文建立在设计和控制论之间的旁边,整合每个领域的道德话语元素。令人难度和设计能够作为自己的元学科,在设计和控制网络的网络网络设计中,用作类似递归的道德方法的模式。这是通过在Heinz von Foersters对道德代码的批评和对设计建筑设计中的痛苦的担忧之间进行探索的进一步探讨。调查结果设计人员将隐含的道德质疑纳入他们设计设计活动的递归过程的一部分,在追求项目和元对话的目标之间移动的对话中,他们质疑哪些目标追求和他们所雇用的方法。在设计架构之间给出了相似之处,并在伦理中(两者都提出了其他人的方式),可以在道德话语中采取类似的方法,在其自身内折叠道德作为自己的荟萃学科。原创性/价值本文提供了一个框架,在其中解决道德话语本身内的道德考虑因素。递归道德质疑这种这种分类提供了一种应对的方式,以赋予当代伦理的分散状态是普通的价值观和目标的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号