首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >No differences in subjective knee function between surgical techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2-year follow-up: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register
【24h】

No differences in subjective knee function between surgical techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at 2-year follow-up: a cohort study from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register

机译:2年随访的前十字韧带重建外科手术技术之间的主观膝关节功能差异:瑞典国家膝盖韧带寄存器的队列研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate how different techniques of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction affect subjective knee function via the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) evaluation 2?years after surgery. It was hypothesized that the surgical techniques of single-bundle ACL reconstruction would result in equivalent results with respect to subjective knee function 2?years after surgery. Methods This cohort study was based on data from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register during the 10-year period of 1 January 2005 through 31 December 2014. Patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction with hamstrings tendon autograft were included. Details on surgical technique were collected using a web-based questionnaire comprised of essential AARSC items, including utilization of accessory medial portal drilling, anatomic tunnel placement, and visualization of insertion sites and landmarks. A repeated measures ANOVA and an additional linear mixed model analysis were used to investigate the effect of surgical technique on the KOOS 4 from the pre-operative period to 2-year follow-up. Results A total of 13,636 patients who had undergone single-bundle ACL reconstruction comprised the study group for this analysis. A repeated measures ANOVA determined that mean subjective knee function differed between the pre-operative time period and at 2-year follow-up ( p ? 4 and surgical technique or gender. Additionally, the linear mixed model adjusted for age at reconstruction, gender, and concomitant injuries showed no difference between surgical techniques in KOOS 4 improvement from baseline to 2-year follow-up. However, KOOS 4 improved significantly in patients for all surgical techniques of single-bundle ACL reconstruction ( p ? Conclusion Surgical techniques of primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction did not demonstrate differences in the improvement in baseline subjective knee function as measured with the KOOS 4 during the first 2?years after surgery. However, subjective knee function improved from pre-operative baseline to 2-year follow-up independently of surgical technique.
机译:摘要目的本研究的目的是探讨单束前十字架韧带(ACL)重建的不同技术如何通过膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)评估2?术后手术后2年来影响主体膝关节函数。假设单束ACL重建的外科手术技术将导致相对于主观膝关节函数2的同等结果2?手术后几年。方法本队列研究基于瑞典国家膝盖韧带注册的数据,于2005年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间,包括腿筋肌腱自体移植母牛自体移植的初级单束ACL重建的患者。采用由基于网络的问卷组成的外科技术的细节,包括由必要的AARSC项目组成,包括使用配件内侧门户钻井,解剖隧道放置和插入地点的可视化和地标。反复测量Anova和额外的线性混合模型分析用于研究从术前期至2年后续行动的koos 4对koos 4的影响。结果共有13,636名经历单束ACL重建的患者,包括该分析的研究组。反复措施Anova确定了平均主观膝关节函数在术前时间段和2年随访之间不同(P?4和手术技术或性别。另外,在重建时期调整为年龄的线性混合模型,伴随的伤害在基线到2年的后续后,KOOS 4改善的手术技术没有差异。然而,对于单束ACL重建的所有手术技术,KOOS 4显着改善了(P?结论初级单一的手术技术-Bundle的ACL重建没有表现出基线主观膝关节函数的改善差异,如手术后的前2年与KOOS 4测量。然而,主观膝关节从术前基线改进到2年的独立随访手术技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号