...
首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >Implantation of mesenchymal stem cells in combination with allogenic cartilage improves cartilage regeneration and clinical outcomes in patients with concomitant high tibial osteotomy
【24h】

Implantation of mesenchymal stem cells in combination with allogenic cartilage improves cartilage regeneration and clinical outcomes in patients with concomitant high tibial osteotomy

机译:间充质干细胞与同种异体软骨组合的植入改善了伴随高胫骨截骨术患者的软骨再生和临床结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose This study aimed to compare the clinical, radiological, and second-look arthroscopic outcomes of implanting mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) alone and together with allogenic cartilage in patients treated with concomitant high tibial oteotomy (HTO) for varus knee osteoarthritis. Methods Eighty patients treated with cartilage repair procedures and concomitant HTO were prospectively randomized into two groups: MSC implantation (MSC group), and MSC implantation with allogenic cartilage (MSC-AC group). Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm Score and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) at preoperative and every follow-up visit. Radiological outcomes were evaluated by measuring the femorotibial angle and posterior tibial slope. During second-look arthroscopy, cartilage regeneration was evaluated according to the Kanamiya grade. Results Clinical outcomes at the second-look arthroscopy (mean 12.5 months [MSC group] and 12.4 months [MSC-AC group]) improved significantly in both groups (P < 0.001 for all). Clinical outcomes from the second-look arthroscopy to the final follow-up (mean 27.3 months [MSC group] and 27.8 months [MSC-AC group]) improved further only in the MSC-AC group (P < 0.05 for all). Overall, the Kanamiya grades, which were significantly correlated with clinical outcomes, were significantly higher in the MSC-AC group than in the MSC group. Radiological outcomes at final follow-up revealed improved knee joint alignments relative to preoperative conditions but without significant correlation between clinical outcomes and Kanamiya grade in either group (n.s. for all). Conclusion Implantation of MSCs with allogenic cartilage is superior to implantation of MSCs alone in cartilage regeneration accompanied with better clinical outcomes.
机译:目的本研究旨在比较单独植入间充质干细胞(MSCs)的临床,放射性和二看关节镜检查,并与伴随的高胫骨针治疗的患者的同种异体软骨一起进行伴随的膝关节骨关节炎。方法用软骨修复程序治疗的八十名患者兼伴HTO治疗分为两组:MSC植入(MSC组),以及与同种异体软骨(MSC-AC组)的MSC植入。使用Lysholm评分和膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)评估临床结果,并在术前和每次随访访问。通过测量初粒角和后胫脚坡来评估放射生物学结果。在二看关节镜检查期间,根据Kanamiya等级评估软骨再生。结果在二次关节镜检查(平均12.5个月]和12.4个月[MSC-AC组])中的临床结果在两组中显着改善(所有所有P <0.001)。从第二外关关节镜检查到最终随访的临床结果(平均27.3个月[MSC组]和27.8个月[MSC-AC组])仅在MSC-AC组中进一步改善(所有所有P <0.05)。总体而言,与临床结果显着相关的Kanamiya等级比MSC组在MSC-AC组中显着高。最终随访的放射性结果显示相对于术前条件的改善的膝关节对齐,但无论临床结果与任一组中的Kanamiya等级有显着相关性(N.S.全部)。结论MSCs与同种异体软骨的植入优于单独的MSCs植入软骨再生,伴随着更好的临床结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号