【24h】

Selecting Assessment Instruments for Problem Behavior Outcome Research With Youth

机译:选择问题行为的评估仪器与青年结盟研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using effect sizes from Erford, Paul, Oncken, Kress, & Erford (2014) meta-analysis for treatments of oppositional defiant disorder and Erford, Bardhoshi, Ross, Gunther, & Duncan (2017) meta-analysis of conduct problems in school-aged youth, the 6 most commonly used disruptive behavior instruments were analyzed for practical and technical strengths and weaknesses, and best use recommendations for screening and counseling outcome research were provided. The instruments included the Achenbach System of Empirically-Based Assessment (ASEBA), Revised Behavior Problem Checklist, Self-Report Delinquency Checklist, Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory/Sutter-Eyberg School Behavior Inventory, Conners-3 Rating Scale, and Parent Daily Report.
机译:使用Erford,Paul,Oncken,Kress,&Erford(2014)治疗的效果大小,对校长的对立挑衅性障碍和Erford的治疗荟萃分析,Bardhoshi,Ross,Gunther,&Duncan(2017年)荟萃分析了学龄儿童的行为问题 青年,为实际和技术优势和劣势分析了6个最常用的破坏性行为仪器,并提供了用于筛选和咨询结果研究的最佳使用建议。 该仪器包括基于经验基于经验的评估(ASEBA)的Achenbach系统,修订了行为问题清单,自我报告违规清单,Eyberg儿童行为库存/ Sutter-Eyberg学校行为库存,Conners-3评级规模和父母每日报告。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号