首页> 外文期刊>Addiction >The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of intranasal crushed buprenorphine and buprenorphinealoxone tablets in opioid abusers.
【24h】

The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile of intranasal crushed buprenorphine and buprenorphinealoxone tablets in opioid abusers.

机译:鼻内压制丁丙诺啡和丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮片对阿片类药物滥用者的药效学和药代动力学特征。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIMS: Sublingual buprenorphine and buprenorphinealoxone are efficacious opioid dependence pharmacotherapies, but there are reports of their diversion and misuse by the intranasal route. The study objectives were to characterize and compare their intranasal pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. SETTING: An in-patient research unit at the University of Kentucky. PARTICIPANTS: Healthy adults (n = 10) abusing, but not physically dependent on, intranasal opioids. MEASUREMENTS: Six sessions (72 hours apart) tested five intranasal doses [0/0, crushed buprenorphine (2, 8 mg), crushed buprenorphinealoxone (2/0.5, 8/2 mg)] and one intravenous dose (0.8 mg buprenorphine/0.2 mg naloxone for bioavailability assessment). Plasma samples, physiological, subject- and observer-rated measures were collected before and for up to 72 hours after drug administration. FINDINGS: Both formulations produced time- and dose-dependent increases on subjective and physiological mu-opioid agonist effects (e.g. 'liking', miosis). Subjects reported higher subjective ratings and street values for 8 mg compared to 8/2 mg, but these differences were not statistically significant. No significant formulation differences in peak plasma buprenorphine concentration or time-course were observed. Buprenorphine bioavailability was 38-44% and T(max) was 35-40 minutes after all intranasal doses. Naloxone bioavailability was 24% and 30% following 2/0.5 and 8/2 mg, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to determine if observed differences in abuse potential between intranasal buprenorphine and buprenorphinealoxone are clinically relevant at the doses tested. Greater bioavailability and faster onset of pharmacodynamic effects compared to sublingual administration suggests a motivation for intranasal misuse in non-dependent opioid abusers. However, significant naloxone absorption from intranasal buprenorphinealoxone administration may deter the likelihood of intranasal misuse of buprenorphinealoxone, but not buprenorphine, in opioid-dependent individuals.
机译:目的:舌下丁丙诺啡和丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮是有效的阿片类药物依赖药物治疗,但有报道称它们经鼻内途径转移和滥用。研究目的是表征和比较其鼻内药效和药代动力学特征。设计:一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照,交叉研究。地点:肯塔基大学的住院研究部门。参与者:健康成人(n = 10)滥用鼻内阿片类药物,但并不依赖于阿片类药物。测量:六个疗程(间隔72小时)测试了五种鼻内剂量[0/0,丁丙诺啡镇静剂(2,8 mg),丁丙诺啡镇静剂/纳洛酮(2 / 0.5,8/2 mg)]和一剂静脉内剂量(0.8 mg丁丙诺啡/0.2 mg纳洛酮用于生物利用度评估)。在给药前和给药后长达72小时收集血浆样品,生理,受试者和观察者评定的量度。研究结果:两种配方在主观和生理上对阿片类药物的激动作用(例如``喜欢'',瞳孔缩小)上均产生时间和剂量依赖性的增加。受试者报告8 mg的主观等级和街道价值高于8/2 mg,但这些差异在统计学上不显着。在峰值血浆丁丙诺啡浓度或时间过程中未观察到明显的制剂差异。鼻内给药后丁丙诺啡的生物利用度为38-44%,T(max)为35-40分钟。纳洛酮在2 / 0.5和8/2 mg后的生物利用度分别为24%和30%。结论:很难确定所观察的剂量下鼻内丁丙诺啡与丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮之间滥用潜能的差异是否在临床上相关。与舌下给药相比,更高的生物利用度和更快的药效学作用提示了非依赖性阿片类药物滥用者鼻内滥用的动机。但是,在阿片类药物依赖的个体中,鼻内使用丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮吸收大量纳洛酮可能会阻止鼻内滥用丁丙诺啡/纳洛酮而不是丁丙诺啡的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号