首页> 外文期刊>F & M: Fabricating & Metalworking >SIX FACTORS IN SELECTING HYDRAULIC OR SHRINK-FIT HOLDERS
【24h】

SIX FACTORS IN SELECTING HYDRAULIC OR SHRINK-FIT HOLDERS

机译:选择液压或收缩夹具的六个因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Shrink-fit and hydraulic holders are especially useful in low clearance, tight work envelopes because of their relatively slim design. This has made them effective in moldmaking applications and more coveted since the widespread adoption of multi-axis machinery. Hydraulic and shrink-fit holders also share a middle-of-the-road gripping strength: about half that of a milling chuck and about double that of collet chucks. These similarities are why we're taking the time to compare the two. When it comes to deciding between one or the other, it's the differences that will guide the choice. So let's dig into some of the fundamental contrasts that may help you decide which holder type is best for you and your work.
机译:收缩配合和液压保持器在低间隙中特别有用,因为它们的设计相对较为薄薄,因此是相对较薄的。 这使得它们在模具制造应用中有效,并且自从广泛采用多轴机械以来更加垂涎。 液压和收缩配件夹具也共享了一条中间夹持力:大约一半的铣削夹头和夹头卡盘的双倍。 这些相似之处是我们花时间比较这两个的原因。 在决定一个或另一个之间时,这是指导选择的差异。 因此,让我们挖掘一些可能帮助您决定哪种持有人类型对您和您的工作最适合的基本对比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号