首页> 外文期刊>Minimally invasive therapy and allied technologies: MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy >Comparison of biliary brush biopsy and fine needle biopsy in the diagnosis of biliary strictures
【24h】

Comparison of biliary brush biopsy and fine needle biopsy in the diagnosis of biliary strictures

机译:胆汁刷活检和细针活检在胆道狭窄诊断中的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of percutaneous fine needle biopsy (FNB) and brush biopsy (BB) at a cancer center. Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of all bile duct biopsies performed in Interventional Radiology between January 2000 and January 2015 was performed. FNB was performed under real-time cholangiographic guidance using a notched needle directed at the bile duct stricture. BB was performed by advancing a brush across the stricture and moving it back and forth to scrape the stricture. Biopsy results were categorized as true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP) and false negative (FN) based on pathology reports and confirmed by surgical specimens or clinical follow-up of at least six months. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the rate of TP in FNB and BB. Results: One-hundred and nineteen patients underwent FNB or BB. Fifteen were censored because of lack of follow-up. The remaining 104 patients underwent a total of 117 bile duct biopsies during the study period: 34 FNB and 83 BB. There were no complications in either group. In the FNB group 22/34 (64%) biopsies were TP, 4/34(12%) were TN and there were 8(24%) FN biopsies. In the BB group, 20/83 (24%) were TP, 38/83 (46%) TN and 25/83 (30%) FN biopsies. There were no FP biopsies in either group. The sensitivity of detecting malignancy by FNB was significantly higher than that by BB (73% vs 44%, p <.0005). There were no complications associated with FNB or BB. Conclusions: FNB of bile duct strictures is safe and has a higher sensitivity for detecting malignancy than BB. ? 2018, ? 2018 Society of Medical Innovation and Technology.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是评估经皮细针活检(FNB)和胶质活组织检查(BB)在癌症中心的准确性。材料和方法:在2000年1月至2015年1月间在介入放射学中进行的所有胆管活检的回顾性分析。使用针对胆管狭窄的缺口针在实时胆管图引导下进行FnB。 BB是通过推进狭窄的刷子来进行,并来回移动以刮伤狭窄。基于病理报告,活组织检查结果分为真正的阳性(TP),真正的阴性(TN),假阳性(FP)和假阴性(FN),并通过手术标本确认或至少六个月的临床随访。 Fisher的确切测试用于比较FNB和BB中的TP速率。结果:一百九岁患者接受FNB或BB。由于缺乏后续行动而被审查了十五段。剩余的104例患者在研究期间经历了117个胆管活组织检查:34 FNB和83 BB。两组没有并发症。在FNB组22/34(64%)中,活组织检查是TP,4/34(12%)是Tn,存在8(24%)的Fn活组织检查。在BB组中,20/83(24%)是TP,38/83(46%)TN和25/83(30%)FN活组织检查。两种组中没有FP活组织检查。通过FNB检测恶性肿瘤的敏感性显着高于BB(73%Vs 44%,P <.000)。没有与FNB或BB相关的并发症。结论:胆管狭窄的FNB是安全的,并且对检测恶性肿瘤的灵敏度高于BB。还2018年,? 2018年医学创新与技术协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号