首页> 外文期刊>Mapan: Journal of Metrology Society of India >Comparison of Monte Carlo Simulation, Least Square Fitting and Calibration Factor Methods for the Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty Using Direct Pressure Indicating Devices
【24h】

Comparison of Monte Carlo Simulation, Least Square Fitting and Calibration Factor Methods for the Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainty Using Direct Pressure Indicating Devices

机译:蒙特卡罗模拟,最小二乘拟合和校准方法的比较使用直流指示装置评估测量不确定性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

At present, several measuring instruments are commercially available in the market for accurate and precise pressure measurements. In case of electromechanical type pressure sensors, the evaluation of measurement uncertainty is always a tedious task for researchers due to lack of availability of the suitable and well-defined mathematical model. In order to harmonize the method of evaluation of measurement uncertainty associated with measuring instruments, "The Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in measurement," published by International Standard Organization, is a major directional guide which is equally important in pressure metrology. The present paper describes the various uncertainty propagation models developed for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty associated with direct pressure indicating devices (DPIDs). A detailed comparative study is presented while using Monte Carlo simulation, least square fitting and calibration factor methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty using a DPID. In order to judge the feasibility and practical applicability of these contemporary methods, it is demonstrated through an example of a case study on the results thus obtained on a DPID that results using three different approaches are in excellent agreement and quite comparable.
机译:目前,几种测量仪器可在市场上商业上可用,以准确和精确的压力测量。在机电型压力传感器的情况下,由于缺乏合适和明确定义的数学模型的可用性,测量不确定性的评估始终是研究人员的繁琐任务。为了协调与测量仪器相关的测量不确定性评估的方法,“国际标准组织出版的测量中不确定性表达的指南”是一个主要的方向指南,在压力计量中同样重要。本文介绍了用于评估与直接压力指示装置(DPID)相关的测量不确定性的评估的各种不确定性传播模型。使用Monte Carlo仿真,最小二乘拟合和校准因子方法来介绍详细的比较研究,用于使用DPID评估测量不确定性。为了判断这些当代方法的可行性和实际适用性,通过案例研究的实例证明了对如此获得的结果的实例研究,该结果使用三种不同方法产生了良好的一致性和相当的可比性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号