...
首页> 外文期刊>Microvascular Research: An International Journal >Comparison of organ-specific endothelial cells in terms of microvascular formation and endothelial barrier functions
【24h】

Comparison of organ-specific endothelial cells in terms of microvascular formation and endothelial barrier functions

机译:在微血管形成和内皮屏障功能方面对器官特异内皮细胞的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Every organ demonstrates specific vascular characteristics and functions maintained by interactions of endothelial cells (ECs) and parenchymal cells. Particularly, brain ECs play a central role in the formation of a functional blood brain barrier (BBB). Organ-specific ECs have their own morphological features, and organ specificity must be considered when investigating interactions between ECs and other cell types constituting a target organ. Here we constructed angiogenesis-based microvascular networks with perivascular cells in a microfluidic device setting by coculturing ECs and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Furthermore, we analyzed endothelial barrier functions as well as fundamental morphology, an essential step to build an in vitro BBB model. In particular, we used both brain microvascular ECs (BMECs) and human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs) to test if organ specificity of ECs affects the formation processes and endothelial barrier functions of an engineered microvascular network. We found that microvascular formation processes differed by the source of ECs. HUVECs formed more extensive microvascular networks compared to BMECs while no differences were observed between BMECs and HUVECs in terms of both the microvascular diameter and the number of pericytes peripherally associated with the microvasculatures. To compare the endothelial barrier functions of each type of EC, we performed fluorescence dextran perfusion on constructed microvasculatures. The permeability coefficient of BMEC microvasculatures was significantly lower than that of HUVEC microvasculatures. In addition, there were significant differences in terms of tight junction protein expression. These results suggest that the organ source of ECs influences the properties of engineered microvasculature and thus is a factor to be considered in the design of organ-specific cell culture models.
机译:每个器官都证明了通过内皮细胞(ECS)和实质细胞的相互作用而维持的特定血管特征和功能。特别是,脑ECS在形成功能性血脑屏障(BBB)中起着核心作用。器官特异性ECS具有自己的形态特征,并且在研究构成靶器官的ECS和其他细胞类型之间的相互作用时必须考虑器官特异性。在这里,我们通过可通过共培养EC和间充质干细胞(MSCs)在微流体装置设置中与血管外细胞构建基于血管生成的微血管网络。此外,我们分析了内皮阻隔功能以及基本形态,构建体外BBB模型的重要步骤。特别是,我们使用脑微血管ECS(BMEC)和人脐静脉ECS(HUVEC)来测试EC的器官特异性是否影响了工程微血管网络的形成过程和内皮阻隔功能。我们发现,ECS的来源不同的微血管形成过程。与BMEC相比,Huvecs形成了更广泛的微血管网络,而BMECs和Huvecs在微血管直径和与微血管外周周周周周周数之间没有观察到差异。为了比较每种EC的内皮阻隔功能,我们对构造的微血管进行了荧光葡聚糖灌注。 BMEC微血管的渗透系数显着低于Huvec微血管的系数。此外,在紧密的结蛋白表达方面存在显着差异。这些结果表明,ECS的器官来源影响了工程微血管结构的性质,因此是在设计器官特异性细胞培养模型的设计中被考虑的一个因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号