...
首页> 外文期刊>Microbial drug resistance: MDR : Mechanisms, epidemiology, and disease >Activity of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate, Rhamnolipids, and N-Acetylcysteine Against Biofilms of Five Common Pathogens
【24h】

Activity of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate, Rhamnolipids, and N-Acetylcysteine Against Biofilms of Five Common Pathogens

机译:硫酸钠,rhamnolipid和N-乙酰半胱氨酸的活性对抗五种常见病原体的生物膜

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Bacteria in biofilms are more resistant to antibacterial agents than bacteria in planktonic form. Hence, antibacterial agents should be able to eradicate biofilms to ensure the best outcomes. Little is known about how well many antibacterial agents can disrupt biofilms. In this study, we compared sodium lauryl sulfate (SDS), rhamnolipids (RHL), and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) for their ability to eradicate mature biofilms and inhibit new biofilm formation against Helicobacter pylori, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus mutans. SDS and RHL effectively inhibited formation of five bacterial biofilms in a dose-dependent manner, even at concentrations below the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), suggesting that their antibiofilm activities are unrelated to their antibacterial activities. In contrast, NAC at certain concentrations promoted biofilm formation by all bacteria except P. aeruginosa, whereas at supra-MIC concentrations, it inhibited biofilm formation against the four bacteria, suggesting that its antibiofilm activity depends on its antibacterial activity. NAC was ineffective at eradicating mature H. pylori biofilms, and it actually promoted their formation at concentrations >10?mg/mL. Our results suggest that RHL is superior at eradicating biofilms of H. pylori, E. coli, and S. mutans; SDS is more effective against S. aureus biofilms; and NAC is more effective against P. aeruginosa biofilms. Our results may help determine which antibiofilm agents are effective against certain bacterial strains and develop agents effective against specific bacterial threats.
机译:生物膜中的细菌比氏菌形式的细菌更耐抗菌剂。因此,抗菌剂应该能够根除生物膜以确保最佳结果。众所周知,许多抗菌剂可以破坏生物膜。在本研究中,我们将十二烷基硫酸钠(SDS),rhamnolipids(RHL)和N-乙酰半胱氨酸(NAc)进行了用于消除成熟生物膜的能力并抑制新的生物膜形成针对幽门螺杆菌,大肠杆菌,假单胞菌铜绿假单胞菌,金黄色葡萄球菌,和链球菌变异。 SDS和RHL以剂量依赖性方式有效地抑制了五种细菌生物膜的形成,即使浓度低于最小抑制浓度(MIC),表明它们的抗菌活性与其抗菌活性无关。相比之下,除了P.铜绿假单胞菌之外的所有细菌的某些浓度的NAc促进了所有细菌的生物膜形成,而在Supra-MIC浓度下,它抑制了对四种细菌的生物膜形成,表明其抗菌活性取决于其抗菌活性。 NAC在根除成熟H.幽门生物膜时无效,并且它实际上在浓度> 10×mg / ml时促进了它们的形成。我们的研究结果表明RHL在根除H.Pylori,大肠杆菌和S. mutans的生物膜上优越; SDS对S. aureus Biofilms更有效; NAC对P. Aeruginosa生物膜更有效。我们的结果可能有助于确定哪种抗生素试剂对某些细菌菌株有效,并且发育有效免受特异性细菌威胁的药剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号