...
首页> 外文期刊>Microbiology and Immunology >NEW FRONTIERS OF LAND AND WATER COMMODIFICATION: SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROVERSIES OF LARGE-SCALE LAND ACQUISITIONS
【24h】

NEW FRONTIERS OF LAND AND WATER COMMODIFICATION: SOCIO-ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROVERSIES OF LARGE-SCALE LAND ACQUISITIONS

机译:新的土地和水商品前沿:社会环境争议大规模征地

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A growing number of regions in the developing world are targeted by transnational investors who are acquiring large amounts of land and natural resources. Driven by the increasing global demand for agricultural products, such investments are often considered an opportunity for economic development in the target country. However, there are concerns about the social and environmental impacts on local communities. In this brief review, we discuss some key socio-environmental controversies surrounding large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs). LSLAs often target common property systems and lead to privatization and commodification of land through long-term land concessions. There is a debate between supporters of foreign land investments as a means to attract modern agricultural technology that would decrease the yield gap in underperforming agricultural land and those who question such a development model because it is seldom coupled with policy instruments that would ensure that the benefits improve food security in local populations. Large-scale land investments displace a variety of systems of production ranging from small-scale farming to (arguably) "unused" land such as forests and savannas on which local communities often depend. Moreover, LSLAs entail an appropriation of water resources that may negatively impact local farmers or downstream human and natural systems. In most cases, investors keep the land fallow but, when they put it under productive use, they typically change land cover and land use to start intensified commercial farming, often for nonfood crops. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:发展中国家中越来越多的地区是通过收购大量土地和自然资源的跨国投资者的目标。由于全球对农产品的全球需求增加,此类投资往往被认为是目标国家经济发展的机会。但是,对当地社区的社会和环境影响有担忧。在这篇简短的综述中,我们讨论了一些围绕大型陆地收购的关键社会环境争议(LSLAS)。 LSLAS经常通过长期土地优惠来实现共同的财产制度,并通过长期的土地优惠导致土地的私有化和商品。外国投资支持者之间存在辩论,作为吸引现代农业技术的手段,将降低表现不佳的农业土地和那些质疑这种发展模式的人的产量差距,因为它很少与确保福利的政策工具相结合改善当地人口的粮食安全。大型土地投资取代了各种生产系统,范围从小规模的农业到(可以说)“未使用”的土地,例如当地社区经常依赖的森林和大草原。此外,LSLA需要拨款可能对当地农民或下游人类和自然系统产生负面影响的水资源。在大多数情况下,投资者将陆地休耕地保持,但是,当他们在生产性使用下时,它们通常会改变土地覆盖和土地利用,以开始加剧商业养殖,通常是非食物。版权所有(c)2017年John Wiley& SONS,LTD.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号