...
首页> 外文期刊>Methods in Ecology and Evolution >Comparison of capture and storage methods for aqueous macrobial eDNA using an optimized extraction protocol: advantage of enclosed filter
【24h】

Comparison of capture and storage methods for aqueous macrobial eDNA using an optimized extraction protocol: advantage of enclosed filter

机译:使用优化提取方案的含水大类edna水溶液捕获方法的比较:封闭式滤波器的优势

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aqueous environmental DNA (eDNA) is an emerging efficient non-invasive tool for species inventory studies. To maximize performance of downstream quantitative PCR (qPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) applications, quality and quantity of the starting material is crucial, calling for optimized capture, storage and extraction techniques of eDNA. Previous comparative studies for eDNA capture/storage have tested precipitation and open' filters. However, practical enclosed' filters which reduce unnecessary handling have not been included. Here, we fill this gap by comparing a filter capsule (Sterivex-GP polyethersulfone, pore size 022m, hereafter called SX) with commonly used methods. Our experimental set-up, covering altogether 41 treatments combining capture by precipitation or filtration with different preservation techniques and storage times, sampled one single lake (and a fish-free control pond). We selected documented capture methods that have successfully targeted a wide range of fauna. The eDNA was extracted using an optimized protocol modified from the DNeasy((R)) Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen). We measured total eDNA concentrations and Cq-values (cycles used for DNA quantification by qPCR) to target specific mtDNA cytochrome b (cyt b) sequences in two local keystone fish species. SX yielded higher amounts of total eDNA along with lower Cq-values than polycarbonate track-etched filters (PCTE), glass fibre filters (GF) or ethanol precipitation (EP). SX also generated lower Cq-values than cellulose nitrate filters (CN) for one of the target species. DNA integrity of SX samples did not decrease significantly after 2weeks of storage in contrast to GF and PCTE. Adding preservative before storage improved SX results. In conclusion, we recommend SX filters (originally designed for filtering micro-organisms) as an efficient capture method for sampling macrobial eDNA. Ethanol or Longmire's buffer preservation of SX immediately after filtration is recommended. Preserved SX capsules may be stored at room temperature for at least 2weeks without significant degradation. Reduced handling and less exposure to outside stress compared with other filters may contribute to better eDNA results. SX capsules are easily transported and enable eDNA sampling in remote and harsh field conditions as samples can be filtered/preserved on site.
机译:含水环境DNA(EDNA)是一种用于物种库存研究的新兴有效的非侵入性工具。为了最大限度地提高下游定量PCR(QPCR)的性能和下一代测序(NGS)应用,起始材料的质量和数量至关重要,呼吁优化EDNA的捕获,储存和提取技术。以前对EDNA捕获/储存的比较研究已经过沉淀和开放的过滤器。但是,未包括实用的封闭式过滤器,这些过滤器尚未包括减少不必要的处理。在这里,我们通过将过滤胶囊(甾体X-GP聚醚砜,孔径022m,以下称为SX)进行比较来填充该差距。我们的实验设置,覆盖了41种治疗,将捕获通过不同的保存技术和储存时间来组合捕获或过滤,取样一个单一湖(和无鱼控制池)。我们选择了已成功定位各种动物的捕获方法。使用从DNEasy((R))血液和amp修饰的优化方案提取EDNA;组织套件(QIAGEN)。我们测量了总EDNA浓度和CQ值(通过QPCR用于DNA定量的循环),以靶向两种局部骨石鱼类中的特异性MTDNA细胞色素B(CYT B)序列。 SX产生较高量的EDNA以及比聚碳酸酯轨道蚀刻过滤器(PCTE),玻璃纤维滤光器(GF)或乙醇沉淀(EP)的降低CQ值。 SX还产生的CQ值比纤维素硝酸丝过滤器(CN)用于一个靶物种。与GF和PCTE形成2周后,SX样品的DNA完整性没有显着降低。在存储后添加腐护改进的SX结果。总之,我们建议SX过滤器(最初设计用于过滤微生物)作为用于采样大类EDNA的有效捕获方法。建议使用乙醇或朗姆勒缓冲SX后保存。保存的SX胶囊可以在室温下储存至少2周,而不会显着降解。与其他过滤器相比,减少处理和暴露于外部应力可能有助于更好的EDNA结果。 SX胶囊容易被运输,并使EDNA在远程和恶劣的现场条件下采样,因为样品可以在现场过滤/保存。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号