首页> 外文期刊>Medicine, health care, and philosophy >Rethinking the doctor-patient relationship: toward a hermeneutically-informed epistemology of medical practice
【24h】

Rethinking the doctor-patient relationship: toward a hermeneutically-informed epistemology of medical practice

机译:重新思考医患关系:走向诠释学的医疗实践认识论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Although typically implicit, clinicians face an inherent conflict between their roles as medical healers and as providers of technical biomedicine (Scott et al. in Philos Ethics Humanit Med 4:11, 2009). This conflict arises from the tension between the physicalist model which still predominates in medical training and practice and the extra-physicalist dimensions of medical practice as epitomised in the concept of patient-centred care. More specifically, the problem is that, as grounded in a borrowed physicalist philosophy, the dominant applied scientist model exhibits a number of limitations which severely restrict its ability to underwrite the effective practice of care. Moreover, being structural in character, these problems cannot be resolved by piecemeal modifications of the existing model, nor by an appeal to evidence-based medicine (Miles in J Eval Clin Pract 15(6):887-890, 2009; Miles in Folia Med 55(1):5-24, 2013; Miles et al. in J Eval Clin Pract 14(5):621-649, 2008). Hence, the need for medical theorists to partner with experts in the humanities to build a sui generis philosophy of medicine (Whatley in J Eval Clin Pract 20(6):961-964, 2014, p.961). In response, the present paper seeks to vindicate the merits of hermeneutically-informed template in providing the requisite grounding. While capable of correcting for the limitations of the applied scientist model, a hermeneutically-informed template is a both/and approach, which seeks to complement rather than exclude the physicalist dimension, and thereby aspires to reconcile technical mastery with patient-centred care, rather than eschew one in favour of the other. As such, it can provide a cogent philosophical template for current best practice, which does justice to the art as well as the science of medical care.
机译:虽然通常是隐含的,但临床医生在其角色之间作为医疗治疗师之间的固有冲突以及技术生物医学的提供者(Scott等人。在Philos伦理Humerit Med 4:11,2009)。这种冲突源于物理主义模型之间的紧张局势,仍然占据了医学培训和实践的偏移以及医疗实践的超重介绍,如患者中心护理的概念所阐述的医学实践。更具体地说,问题是,正如借用物理主义哲学的基础所在,所占主导地位的科学家模型表现出许多限制,严重限制了其承保有效实践的能力。此外,在结构中的结构中,这些问题不能通过现有模型的零碎修改来解决,也无法通过吸引力的基于循证医学(J EVG CLIN施法15(6):887-890,2009;叶子中英里Med 55(1):5-24,2013; Miles et al。在J EVG CLIN实践14(5):621-649,2008)。因此,医疗理论家的需要与人文学科专家合作,建立一个隋普通的医学哲学(J eval Clin练习20(6):961-964,2014,P.961)。作为回应,本文旨在致力于提供必要的接地方面的诠释信息模板的优点。虽然能够纠正应用科学家模型的局限性,但诠释到的模板是一种/和方法,它旨在补充而不是排除物理主义方面的尺寸,从而渴望与患者中心的护理协调技术掌握,相反而不是避开另一个人。因此,它可以为目前的最佳实践提供一种易言论模板,这对本领域的正义以及医疗护理科学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号