首页> 外文期刊>Medical teacher >A systematic review of the approaches to multi-level learning in the general practice context, using a realist synthesis approach: BEME Guide No. 55
【24h】

A systematic review of the approaches to multi-level learning in the general practice context, using a realist synthesis approach: BEME Guide No. 55

机译:系统审查在一般实践背景下的多级学习方法,使用现实主义综合方法:Beme指南第55号

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Recent global increases in medical student numbers and shifts in medical education from teaching hospitals to community settings call for effective strategies to meet the demand for general practice teaching placements. It has been proposed that "multi-level learning" (MLL), in which learning and teaching are shared across different levels of learners, may provide teaching efficiencies and valuable experiences for learners and teachers. Aims: To identify, evaluate and synthesize the evidence related to the types, benefits, challenges, and facilitators of MLL in community-based general practice, and the underlying mechanisms and associated contexts to explain the reported outcomes. Method: A realist synthesis approach guided the systematic review. Results: Fifteen papers were identified, providing primary evaluation data predominantly from interviews with or surveys of key stakeholders. Generally, all levels of learners reported overall satisfaction with their MLL experiences. Medical students appreciated learning from prevocational doctors and registrars due to social and cognitive congruence. Mechanisms and contexts that supported our hypotheses regarding successful MLL outcomes were identified, with "a strong teaching culture" being a major mechanism. Conclusions: The findings can help inform practices considering the implementation or enhancement of MLL initiatives in general practice. Further research should include measuring defined learning outcomes.
机译:背景:最近的全球医学学生数量增加以及医学教育从教学教育转移到社区设置呼吁有效策略,以满足一般实践教学展示的需求。已经提出了“多级学习”(MLL),其中学习和教学在不同层次的学习者中,可能为学习者和教师提供教学效率和有价值的经验。目标:识别,评估和综合与社区的一般实践中MLL的类型,福利,挑战和促进者有关的证据,以及解释报告的结果的潜在机制和相关背景。方法:现实主义综合方法引导系统审查。结果:确定了十五篇论文,主要提供了与关键利益相关者的访谈或调查的主要评估数据。一般来说,所有级别的学习者都会对他们的MLL经历报告总体满意度。由于社会和认知的一致性,医学生赞赏地从普遍存在的医生和注册商学习。确定了支持我们的假设关于成功的MLL结果的机制和背景,并具有“强大的教学文化”是一个主要机制。结论:考虑到一般实践中,考虑到实施或加强MLL倡议的实施方式有助于提供信息。进一步的研究应包括测量定义的学习结果。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Medical teacher》 |2019年第8期|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Queensland Fac Med Primary Care Clin Unit Level 8 Hlth Sci Bldg Brisbane Qld Australia;

    Univ Queensland Fac Med Primary Care Clin Unit Level 8 Hlth Sci Bldg Brisbane Qld Australia;

    Univ Queensland Fac Med Primary Care Clin Unit Level 8 Hlth Sci Bldg Brisbane Qld Australia;

    Univ Queensland Fac Med Primary Care Clin Unit Level 8 Hlth Sci Bldg Brisbane Qld Australia;

    Australian Natl Univ Med Sch Acad Unit Gen Practice Canberra ACT Australia;

    Univ Technol Sydney Fac Arts &

    Social Sci Sydney NSW Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 医药、卫生;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号