首页> 外文期刊>Medical oncology >Tolerability and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy comparing carboplatin/paclitaxel versus platinum/5-FU regimen for locally advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers
【24h】

Tolerability and efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy comparing carboplatin/paclitaxel versus platinum/5-FU regimen for locally advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers

机译:同时化学疗法比较Carboplatin /紫杉醇与铂/ 5-FU方案对局部晚期食管和食管胃癌结癌的耐受性和疗效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Platinum/5-fluorouracil (PF) is commonly used for chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for locally advanced esophageal and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancers. Weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) regimen for preoperative CRT has increased in popularity due to its potentially less toxicity. We retrospectively compared the tolerability and efficacy of these regimens. Patients with esophageal and EGJ squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) or adenocarcinoma who received CRT with curative intent were included. Safety and tolerability during CRT were evaluated using the CTCAE version 4.0. Efficacy was analyzed using pathologic complete response, disease-free survival, and overall survival. One hundred and twentyfour patients were eligible for analysis (CP = 64, PF = 60). Most patients had esophageal cancer (97%) with SCC histology (91%). Preoperative CRT was planned for 43% of patients in the CP group and 34% in the PF group (p = 0.306). The relative dose intensities of cisplatin (67.0%) and 5-fluorouracil (81.4%) were lower than those of carboplatin (86.6%) and paclitaxel (86.2%). No difference in the radiotherapy dose, hospitalization, interruption, or termination was observed between the groups. Dose reduction of chemotherapy was more frequent in the CP group (38 vs. 19%; p = 0.015). Febrile neutropenia was more frequent in the PF group (8 vs. 0%; p = 0.058). Allgrade nausea/vomiting was lower in the CP group (20 vs. 38%; p = 0.032). Efficacy was comparable between both regimens. In the multivariate analysis, the CRT regimen was not a significant predictor of survival. The CP regimen had less toxicity than the PF regimen, while efficacy was comparable. A large prospective randomized study is warranted to confirm these results.
机译:铂/ 5-氟尿嘧啶(PF)通常用于化学疗法(CRT),用于局部晚期食管和食管胃部接线(EGJ)癌症。每周卡铂和PACLITAXEL(CP)术前CRT的方案由于其潜在的毒性而增加。我们回顾性地比较了这些方案的耐受性和功效。包括食管和EGJ鳞状细胞癌(SCC)或接受治疗意图的腺癌或腺癌的患者。使用CTCAE 4.0评估CRT期间的安全性和耐受性。使用病理完全反应,无病生存和整体存活进行分析疗效。一百二十岁的患者有资格进行分析(CP = 64,PF = 60)。大多数患者具有食管癌(97%),SCC组织学(91%)。术前CRT计划在CP组中43%的患者,PF组中的34%(P = 0.306)。顺铂(67.0%)和5-氟尿嘧啶(81.4%)的相对剂量强度低于卡铂(86.6%)和紫杉醇(86.2%)。在组之间观察到放射治疗剂量,住院,中断或终止的无差异。在CP组中更频繁地减少化学疗法(38 vs.19%; P = 0.015)。 PF组(8 vs. 0%; P = 0.058)中更频繁地频繁。 CP组的Allgrade恶心/呕吐物(20 vs.38%; P = 0.032)。两种方案之间的功效相当。在多变量分析中,CRT方案不是存活率的显着预测因子。 CP方案的毒性小于PF方案,而疗效则相当。有一个大型预期随机调查得到保证以确认这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号