...
首页> 外文期刊>Medicine and science in sports and exercise >Adults' Past-Day Recall of Sedentary Time: Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness.
【24h】

Adults' Past-Day Recall of Sedentary Time: Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness.

机译:成人的过去一天回忆久坐时间:可靠性,有效性和响应能力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: Past-day recall rather than recall of past week or a usual/typical day may improve the validity of self-reported sedentary time measures. This study examined the test-retest reliability, criterion validity, and responsiveness of the seven-item questionnaire, Past-day Adults' Sedentary Time (PAST). METHODS: Participants (breast cancer survivors, n = 90, age = 33-75 yr, body mass index = 25-40 kg·m) in a 6-month randomized controlled trial of a lifestyle-based weight loss intervention completed the interviewer-administered PAST questionnaire about time spent sitting/lying on the previous day for work, transport, television viewing, nonwork computer use, reading, hobbies, and other purposes (summed for total sedentary time). The instrument was administered at baseline, 7 d later for test-retest reliability (n = 86), and at follow-up. ActivPAL3-assessed sit/lie time in bouts of ≥5 min during waking hours on the recall day was used as the validity criterion measure at both baseline (n = 72) and follow-up (n = 68). Analyses included intraclass correlation coefficients, Pearson's correlations (r), and Bland-Altman plots and responsiveness index. RESULTS: The PAST had fair to good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.32-0.64). At baseline, the correlation between PAST and activPAL sit/lie time was r = 0.57 (95% CI = 0.39-0.71). The mean difference between PAST at baseline and retest was -25 min (5.2%), 95% limits of agreement = -5.9 to 5.0 h, and the activPAL sit/lie time was -9 min (1.8%), 95% limits of agreement = -4.9 to 4.6 h. The PAST showed small but significant responsiveness (-0.44, 95% CI = -0.92 to -0.04); responsiveness of activPAL sit/lie time was not significant. CONCLUSION: The PAST questionnaire provided an easy-to-administer measure of sedentary time in this sample. Validity and reliability findings compare favorably with other sedentary time questionnaires. Past-day recall of sedentary time shows promise for use in future health behavior, epidemiological, and population surveillance studies.
机译:目的:过去一天召回而不是过去一周或常规/典型的一天可能会提高自我报告的久坐时间措施的有效性。本研究检测了七项问卷,过去的成年人久坐时间(过去)的测试 - 重新测试的可靠性,标准有效性和响应能力。方法:参与者(乳腺癌幸存者,N = 90,年龄= 33-75岁,体重指数= 25-40千克·M)在6个月的随机对照试验中的一个基于生活方式的体重减轻干预完成面试官 - 在上一天的工作,运输,电视观看,非工作计算机使用,阅读,爱好和其他目的(总共久坐时间),管理过去的调查问卷。仪器以基线,7d以后施用,以进行测试 - 保持可靠性(n = 86),并在随访中。在召唤日唤醒时间唤醒时间≥5分钟的ActivePal3评估/地区时间被用作两种基线(n = 72)和随访(n = 68)的有效性标准测量。分析包括颅内相关系数,Pearson的相关性(R)和Bland-Altman图和响应性指数。结果:过去具有良好的测试保持可靠性(脑内相关系数= 0.50,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.32-0.64)的公平。在基线时,过去和Activepal之间的相关性坐/地时间是r = 0.57(95%Ci = 0.39-0.71)。过去的基线和重保持的平均差异为-25分钟(5.2%),协议的95%限制= -5.9至5.0小时,Activalpal Sit / Lie时间为-9分钟(1.8%),限制为95%协议= -4.9至4.6小时。过去表现出小但显着的响应性(-0.44,95%CI = -0.92至-0.04); Activalpal坐/谎时间的响应性并不重要。结论:过去的问卷提供了该样本中易于施用的久坐不动时间的衡量标准。有效性和可靠性调查结果与其他久坐时间问卷相比有利。过去一天召回久坐时间显示未来健康行为,流行病学和人口监测研究的承诺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号