...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical education >How can systems engineering inform the methods of programme evaluation in health professions education?
【24h】

How can systems engineering inform the methods of programme evaluation in health professions education?

机译:系统工程如何通知健康专业教育方案评估方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Context We evaluate programmes in health professions education ( HPE ) to determine their effectiveness and value. Programme evaluation has evolved from use of reductionist frameworks to those addressing the complex interactions between programme factors. Researchers in HPE have recently suggested a ‘holistic programme evaluation’ aiming to better describe and understand the implications of ‘emergent processes and outcomes’. Framework We propose a programme evaluation framework informed by principles and tools from systems engineering. Systems engineers conceptualise complexity and emergent elements in unique ways that may complement and extend contemporary programme evaluations in HPE . We demonstrate how the abstract decomposition space ( ADS ), an engineering knowledge elicitation tool, provides the foundation for a systems engineering informed programme evaluation designed to capture both planned and emergent programme elements. Methods We translate the ADS tool to use education‐oriented language, and describe how evaluators can use it to create a programme‐specific ADS through iterative refinement. We provide a conceptualisation of emergent elements and an equation?that evaluators can use to identify the emergent elements in their programme. Using our framework, evaluators can analyse programmes not as isolated units with planned processes and planned outcomes, but as unfolding, complex interactive systems that will exhibit emergent processes and emergent outcomes. Subsequent analysis of these emergent elements will inform the evaluator as they seek to optimise and improve the programme. Conclusion Our proposed systems engineering informed programme evaluation framework provides principles and tools for analysing the implications of planned and emergent elements, as well as their potential interactions. We acknowledge that our framework is preliminary and will require application and constant refinement. We suggest that our framework will also advance our understanding of the construct of ‘emergence’ in HPE research.
机译:背景信息我们评估健康专业教育(HPE)的课程,以确定其有效性和价值。程序评估已经从使用还原框架中演变为解决方案因素之间复杂相互作用的人。 HPE的研究人员最近提出了一个“整体计划评估”,旨在更好地描述并理解“紧急过程和结果”的影响。框架我们提出了由系统工程的原则和工具通知的程序评估框架。系统工程师以独特的方式概念性复杂性和紧急元素,可以补充和扩展HPE的当代计划评估。我们展示了抽象分解空间(广告),工程知识素材工具,为旨在捕获计划和紧急程序元素的系统工程知识的程序评估提供了基础。方法查看广告工具以使用教育为导向的语言,并通过迭代细化描述评估员如何使用它来创建特定于计划的广告。我们提供了紧急元素和等式的概念化?评估员可以用来识别他们的计划中的紧急元素。使用我们的框架,评估人员可以分析程序不作为具有计划流程和计划成果的孤立单位的程序,但作为展开,复杂的交互式系统将表现出突出的过程和紧急成果。随后对这些紧急元素的分析将为评估者通知评估者,因为他们寻求优化和改进该计划。结论我们拟议的系统工程知情计划评估框架提供了分析计划和紧急元素的影响以及其潜在互动的原则和工具。我们承认我们的框架是初步的,需要应用和不断的细化。我们建议我们的框架还将推动我们对HPE研究中的“出现”构建的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号