【24h】

Classifying clinical notes with pain assessment using machine learning

机译:使用机器学习对疼痛评估进行分类临床注意事项

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pain is a significant public health problem, affecting millions of people in the USA. Evidence has highlighted that patients with chronic pain often suffer from deficits in pain care quality (PCQ) including pain assessment, treatment, and reassessment. Currently, there is no intelligent and reliable approach to identify PCQ indicators inelectronic health records (EHR). Hereby, we used unstructured text narratives in the EHR to derive pain assessment in clinical notes for patients with chronic pain. Our dataset includes patients with documented pain intensity rating ratings = 4 and initial musculoskeletal diagnoses (MSD) captured by (ICD-9-CM codes) in fiscal year 2011 and a minimal 1 year of follow-up (follow-up period is 3-yr maximum); with complete data on key demographic variables. A total of 92 patients with 1058 notes was used. First, we manually annotated qualifiers and descriptors of pain assessment using the annotation schema that we previously developed. Second, we developed a reliable classifier for indicators of pain assessment in clinical note. Based on our annotation schema, we found variations in documenting the subclasses of pain assessment. In positive notes, providers mostly documented assessment of pain site (67%) and intensity of pain (57%), followed by persistence (32%). In only 27% of positive notes, did providers document a presumed etiology for the pain complaint or diagnosis. Documentation of patients' reports of factors that aggravate pain was only present in 11% of positive notes. Random forest classifier achieved the best performance labeling clinical notes with pain assessment information, compared to other classifiers; 94, 95, 94, and 94% was observed in terms of accuracy, PPV, F1-score, and AUC, respectively. Despite the wide spectrum of research that utilizes machine learning in many clinical applications, none explored using these methods for pain assessment research. In addition, previous studies using large datasets to detect and analyze characteristics of patients with various types of pain have relied exclusively on billing and coded data as the main source of information. This study, in contrast, harnessed unstructured narrative text data from the EHR to detect pain assessment clinical notes. We developed a Random forest classifier to identify clinical notes with pain assessment information. Compared to other classifiers, ours achieved the best results in most of the reported metrics.
机译:痛苦是一个重要的公共卫生问题,影响着数百万人在美国。证据强调,慢性疼痛的患者经常患有痛苦护理质量(PCQ)的缺陷,包括疼痛评估,治疗和重新评估。目前,没有智能且可靠的方法来识别电力健康记录(EHR)的PCQ指标。因此,我们在EHR中使用了非结构化的文本叙述在慢性疼痛患者的临床注意中获得疼痛评估。我们的数据集包括记录疼痛强度等级评级患者的患者> (ICD-9-CM代码)在2011财年和最小1年后续后续的初始肌肉骨骼诊断(MSD)(后续期为3年);具有关键人口变量的完整数据。共有92名患有1058个备注的患者。首先,使用我们之前开发的注释模式手动注释的止痛评估的限定员和描述符。其次,我们开发了一种可靠的分类器,用于临床报纸中的疼痛评估指标。根据我们的注释架构,我们发现了记录疼痛评估子类的变化。在正面备注中,提供者主要记录对疼痛部位(67%)的评估和疼痛强度(57%),其次是持久性(32%)。仅在27%的正面票据中,提供商为痛苦投诉或诊断提供了假定的病因。患者的文件报告加重疼痛的因素仅占积极票据的11%。随机森林分类器与其他分类器相比,达到了具有疼痛评估信息的最佳性能标记临床注意事项;在准确性,PPV,F1分数和AUC方面观察到94,95,94和94%。尽管采用了许多临床应用中的机器学习的广泛研究,但没有利用这些疼痛评估研究方法探索。此外,以前的研究使用大型数据集检测和分析各种类型疼痛患者的特征,仅仅依赖于计费和编码数据作为主要信息来源。该研究相比之下,利用EHR利用非结构化的叙事文本数据来检测疼痛评估临床票据。我们开发了一个随机林分类器,以识别患有疼痛评估信息的临床注意事项。与其他分类器相比,我们在大多数报告的指标中取得了最佳结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号