首页> 外文期刊>Medical decision making: An international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making >Comparison of Logistic Regression and Bayesian Networks for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer Recurrence
【24h】

Comparison of Logistic Regression and Bayesian Networks for Risk Prediction of Breast Cancer Recurrence

机译:乳腺癌复发风险预测逻辑回归与贝叶斯网络的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose. For individualized follow-up, accurate prediction of locoregional recurrence (LRR) and second primary (SP) breast cancer risk is required. Current prediction models employ regression, but with large data sets, machine-learning techniques such as Bayesian Networks (BNs) may be better alternatives. In this study, logistic regression was compared with different BNs, built with network classifiers and constraint- and score-based algorithms. Methods. Women diagnosed with early breast cancer between 2003 and 2006 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) (N = 37,320). BN structures were developed using 1) Bayesian network classifiers, 2) correlation coefficients with different cutoffs, 3) constraint-based learning algorithms, and 4) score-based learning algorithms. The different models were compared with logistic regression using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, an external validation set obtained from the NCR from 2007 and 2008 (N = 12,308), and subgroup analyses for a high- and low-risk group. Results. The BNs with the most links showed the best performance in both LRR and SP prediction (c-statistic of 0.76 for LRR and 0.69 for SP). In the external validation, logistic regression generally outperformed the BNs in both SP and LRR (c-statistic of 0.71 for LRR and 0.64 for SP). The differences were nonetheless small. Although logistic regression performed best on most parts of the subgroup analysis, BNs outperformed regression with respect to average risk for SP prediction in low- and high-risk groups. Conclusions. Although estimates of regression coefficients depend on other independent variables, there is no assumed dependence relationship between coefficient estimators and the change in value of other variables as in the case of BNs. Nonetheless, this analysis suggests that regression is still more accurate or at least as accurate as BNs for risk estimation for both LRRs and SP tumors.
机译:目的。对于个性化随访,需要准确地预测招脑复发(LRR)和第二次初级(SP)乳腺癌风险。目前的预测模型采用回归,但是大数据集,诸如贝叶斯网络(BNS)之类的机器学习技术可能是更好的替代方案。在这项研究中,将Logistic回归与不同的BNS进行比较,内置于网络分类器和基于约束和得分的算法。方法。 2003年至2006年期间患有早期乳腺癌的女性选自荷兰癌症登记处(N = 37,320)。 BN结构采用1)贝叶斯网络分类器,2)具有不同截止值,3)基于约束的学习算法的相关系数和4)基于刻度的学习算法。将不同的模型与使用接收器操作特性曲线下的区域的逻辑回归进行比较,从2007年和2008(n = 12,308)的NCR中获得的外部验证集,以及用于高风险组的子组分析。结果。具有大多数链接的BNS在LRR和SP预测中显示了最佳性能(用于LRR的0.76的C型统计,SP的0.69)。在外部验证中,Logistic回归通常优于SP和LRR中的BNS(用于LRR的0.71的C级和0.64)。尽管如此,差异较小。虽然逻辑回归在亚组分析的大多数部分最佳地,但是BNS在低风险和高风险群体中对SP预测的平均风险表现出最佳的回归。结论。尽管回归系数的估计取决于其他自变量,但系数估计器之间没有假设的依赖关系和其他变量的变化与BNS的情况。尽管如此,该分析表明回归仍然更准确或至少与LRRS和SP肿瘤都有风险估计的BNS。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号