...
首页> 外文期刊>Maternal and child health journal >Examining the Prevalence Rates of Preexisting Maternal Medical Conditions and Pregnancy Complications by Source: Evidence to Inform Maternal and Child Research
【24h】

Examining the Prevalence Rates of Preexisting Maternal Medical Conditions and Pregnancy Complications by Source: Evidence to Inform Maternal and Child Research

机译:通过来源来检查预先存在的孕产妇医疗病症和妊娠并发症的患病率:证据提供孕产妇女研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives We sought to examine whether there are systematic differences in ascertainment of preexisting maternal medical conditions and pregnancy complications from three common data sources used in epidemiologic research. Methods Diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), gestational hypertensive disorders (GHD), placental abruption and premature rupture of membranes (PROM) among 4821 pregnancies were identified via birth certificates, maternal self-report at approximately 4 months postpartum and by discharge codes from the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS), a mandatory New York State hospital reporting system. The kappa statistic (k) was estimated to ascertain beyond chance agreement of outcomes between birth certificates with either maternal self-report or SPARCS. Results GHD was under-ascertained on birth certificates (5.7 %) and more frequently indicated by maternal report (11 %) and discharge data (8.2 %). PROM was indicated more on birth certificates (7.4 %) than maternal report (4.5 %) or discharge data (5.7 %). Confirmation across data sources for some outcomes varied by maternal age, race/ethnicity, prenatal care utilization, preterm delivery, parity, mode of delivery, infant sex, use of infertility treatment and for multiple births. Agreement between maternal report and discharge data with birth certificates was generally poor (kappa < 0.4) to moderate (0.4 <= kappa < 0.75) but was excellent between discharge data and birth certificates for GDM among women who underwent infertility treatment (kappa = 0.79, 95 % CI 0.74, 0.85). Conclusions for Practice Prevalence and agreement of conditions varied across sources. Condition-specific variations in reporting should be considered when designing studies that investigate associations between preexisting maternal medical and pregnancy-related conditions with health outcomes over the life-course.
机译:我们试图检查来自流行病学研究中使用的三种常见数据来源的预先存在的孕产妇医疗病症和妊娠并发症是否存在系统差异。方法糖尿病,慢性高血压,妊娠期糖尿病(GDM),妊娠期高血压障碍(GHD),胎儿突然紊乱和膜(PROM)的早产(PROM)通过出生证明,孕产妇自我报告在产后的孕产量及产后于50次及通过州全州规划和研究合作系统(SPARCS)的解码,强制纽约州立医院报告系统。据估计,Kappa统计(k)估计,以母体自我报告或SPARC的出生证明之间的成果达不大达成款。结果GHD在出生证书(5.7%)上确定,更频繁地被母体报告(11%)和出院数据(8.2%)。 PROM在出生证书(7.4%)上表示比母体报告(4.5%)或出院数据(5.7%)。跨国源确认有些结果因孕产妇年龄而变化而变化,种族/种族,产前护理利用,早产,奇偶校验,递送方式,婴儿性别,不孕症治疗和多个出生。母体报告和出生证书的出院数据之间的协议通常较差(Kappa <0.4)至中等(0.4 <= kappa <0.75),但在不孕不孕治疗的女性中的GDM中的放电数据和出生证书之间(Kappa = 0.79 95%CI 0.74,0.85)。结论普遍普遍性和条件协议各种各样的来源。在设计研究中,应考虑报告的条件特定的变化,这些研究调查预先存在的孕产妇医学和妊娠相关条件与生命课程的健康结果之间的关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号