...
首页> 外文期刊>Fortschritte der Physik >Mendelian segregation of leaf phenotypes in experimental F-2 hybrids elucidates origin of morphological diversity of the apomictic Ranunculus auricmus complex
【24h】

Mendelian segregation of leaf phenotypes in experimental F-2 hybrids elucidates origin of morphological diversity of the apomictic Ranunculus auricmus complex

机译:实验性F-2杂种叶片表型的孟德尔偏析阐明了Apomictic毛茛属植物复合物的形态多样性的起源

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Apomictic plant complexes exhibit a stunning morphological diversity. The Ranunculus auricomus complex with more than 800 morphologically recognized asexual species and just 4 known sexual species is a model group to study origins of high morphological diversity in asexually reproducing lineages. During the Pleistocene, the sexuals of the R. auricomus complex diverged in Central Europe into two morphological groups of contrasting basal leaf phenotypes, the undivided forms represented by diploid R. carpaticola and the deeply divided forms represented by diploid R. notabilis. An experimental inter specific crossing of R. carpaticola x R. notabilis revealed an extensive phenotypic diversity of the sexually formed F-2 hybrid generation. We hypothesize that apomictic species of the European R. auricomus complex might have established from hybrid derivatives of carpaticola- and notabilis-like sexual ancestors. Here we investigate segregation of F-2 basal leaf phenotypes from experimental R. carpaticola x R. notabilis crosses. We tested the hypothesis whether F-2 hybrid leaf phenotypes segregate in a Mendelian manner and whether any segregant phenotypes match R. variabilis, an apomictic species and natural hybrid derivative of R. notabilis. Using landmark-based geometric morphometrics of basal leaves, we recognized two major morphological clusters within the R. carpaticola x R. notabilis F-2 hybrid population. The carpaticola-like morphological cluster included undivided or less-divided leaf phenotypes without lateral sinuses and the notabilis-like morphological cluster contained deeply divided leaf phenotypes with 1 - 2 lateral sinuses. The overall ratio of the both morphological clusters within the F-2 hybrid population was approximately 1 : 1, suggesting Mendelian inheritance and partial dominance of the allele for the divided leaf phenotype. The morphological cluster of divided leaf phenotypes included 11% of F-2 individuals with a higher similarity to the apomictic species R. variabilis than to the parental sexuals. The variabilis-like F-2 segregant phenotypes often resulted from F, crosses of carpaticola-like mother plants with notabilis-like pollen donors; such crossing lines reached the highest morphological disparity. Equivalent hybridizations in nature followed by Mendelian segregation of phenotypes, which became later on fixed via the shift to apomictic reproduction, might have established the extant diversity of apomictic complexes. Microsatellite genotyping with six SSR loci revealed no correlation of genetic and phenotypic variation. We conclude that former "morpho-groups" or "main species" based on phenotypic similarity only are unsuitable units for taxonomic classification.
机译:AFOMictic植物复合物表现出令人惊叹的形态样。毛茛属植物综合体具有超过800种形态公认的无性物种和仅为4种知名的性物种是一个模型组,用于研究无性再现谱系中高形态多样性的起源。在更新世期间,R. auricomus综合体的性患者在中欧分化为两种对比叶片表型的两种形态组,由二倍体R.Carpaticola代表的未分裂形式和由二倍体R. notabilis代表的深度分割形式。 R. carpaticola x R. notabilis的实验性米特异性交叉揭示了性形成的F-2杂交生成的广泛表型多样性。我们假设欧洲R. auricomus综合体的APOMictic种类可能已经从Carpaticola-和Notabilis样性祖先的杂交衍生物中建立。在这里,我们研究了来自实验R.Carpaticola X R. Notabilis Crosss的F-2基础叶表型的分离。我们测试了假设F-2杂交叶表型是否以孟塞式方式分离,以及是否有任何分离表型与R.Variabilis匹配,APOMicicic和R.Bonabilis的天然杂合衍生物。使用基于地标的基础叶片的几何形态化学,我们在R.Carpaticola X R. Notabilis F-2杂种群体中认识到两个主要的形态簇。鲤鱼样形态簇包括没有横向鼻窦的未分裂或较少分裂的叶片表型,并且含有NOTABILIS的形态簇用1-2个侧向鼻窦含有深度分割的叶片表型。 F-2杂交种群内的两种形态簇的总比为1:1,表明孟德尔遗传和分割叶片表型等位基因的临床遗传。分裂叶片表型的形态簇包括11%的F-2个体,与APOMICTIC物种R. Variabilis的相似性更高,而不是父母的性。像瓦里亚贝里斯的F-2分离表型常常由F,用NOTABILIS样花粉供体的Carpaticola样母植物的十字架;这种交叉线达到了最高的形态差异。性质中的等效杂交之后是孟德尔的表型分离,后来通过转变为审计繁殖来修复,这可能已经建立了截止综合性复合物的分类。六个SSR基因座的微卫星基因分型揭示了遗传和表型变异的相关性。我们得出结论,前者基于表型相似性的“Morpho-group”或“主要物种”仅是分类学分类的不合适单位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号