...
首页> 外文期刊>Medical humanities >Prosthesis and the engineered imagination: reading augmentation and disability across cultural theory, representation and product design
【24h】

Prosthesis and the engineered imagination: reading augmentation and disability across cultural theory, representation and product design

机译:假肢和工程想象力:跨文化理论,代表和产品设计阅读增强和残疾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article argues for the value of considering the interaction of literary/cultural studies, disability studies and engineering/design studies in the ongoing development of a critical medical humanities research frame. With a specific focus on prosthesis, but also considerations of embodiment, technology and augmentation as concepts in both cultural/disability theory and engineering/design, we note how the shifting and plastic ideas of 'the prosthetic' as used within cultural studies have never been in conversation with scholars who work on prostheses in engineering design or the processes through which such technologies are produced. Additionally, we show that the increased use of systems engineering in the design and construction of prostheses creates fractured ideas of disabled bodies that frequently ignore both the cultural meaning and lived experience of technology use. In design and engineering, prostheses are literal objects, often made to order for a diverse range of clients and produced across different working platforms; in cultural studies, the word creates multiple resonances around both augmented bodies and non-embodied states increasingly understood in terms of assemblage and supplementarity. Working from this, we outline how questions of metaphor, materiality and systems weave through the different disciplines. The article claims that a critical dialogue between the working methods of literary/cultural studies and engineering/design, for all their obvious differences, possesses the potential to create informed and sophisticated accounts of disability embodiment. Our conclusion brings the strands of the enquiry together and points to the merits of engineering the imagination, and imagining engineering, as both a subject and method in future medical humanities research.
机译:本文争辩于考虑文学/文化研究,残疾研究和工程/设计研究在持续发展中的关键医学人文研究框架的互动的值。对于假肢的特定专注,还考虑了实施例,技术和增强作为文化/残疾理论和工程/设计的概念,我们注意到文化研究中使用的“假肢”的转移和塑料思想从未如此在与学者谈话中,他们在工程设计中工作的假体或生产这些技术的过程。此外,我们表明,系统工程在设计和构建中使用系统工程的使用增加了残疾机构的骨折思想,经常忽视文化意义和技术使用的生活经验。在设计和工程方面,假肢是文字对象,通常是为了为各种客户提供各种客户,并在不同的工作平台上产生;在文化研究中,这个词围绕两个增强机构和非体现国家在组合和补充性方面创造了多种共振。从事这个问题,我们概述了隐喻,物质和系统如何通过不同的学科。本文声称,文学/文化研究和工程/设计的工作方法与所有明显差异之间的关键对话具有创建残疾实施例的知情和复杂账户的潜力。我们的结论使询问的股票在一起,并指出了工程的宗旨,想象力和想象工程,作为未来医学人文研究中的主题和方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号