...
首页> 外文期刊>Mathematical geosciences >How Different Analysis and Interpolation Methods Affect the Accuracy of Ice Surface Elevation Changes Inferred from Satellite Altimetry
【24h】

How Different Analysis and Interpolation Methods Affect the Accuracy of Ice Surface Elevation Changes Inferred from Satellite Altimetry

机译:不同的分析和插值方法如何影响卫星高度测量的冰面高度变化的准确性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Satellite altimetry has been widely used to determine surface elevation changes in polar ice sheets. The original height measurements are irregularly distributed in space and time. Gridded surface elevation changes are commonly derived by repeat altimetry analysis (RAA) and subsequent spatial interpolation of height change estimates. This article assesses how methodological choices related to those two steps affect the accuracy of surface elevation changes, and how well this accuracy is represented by formal uncertainties. In a simulation environment resembling CryoSat-2 measurements acquired over a region in northeast Greenland between December 2010 and January 2014, different local topography modeling approaches and different cell sizes for RAA, and four interpolation approaches are tested. Among the simulated cases, the choice of either favorable or unfavorable RAA affects the accuracy of results by about a factor of 6, and the different accuracy levels are propagated into the results of interpolation. For RAA, correcting local topography by an external digital elevation model (DEM) is best, if a very precise DEM is available, which is not always the case. Yet the best DEM-independent local topography correction (nine-parameter model within a 3,000 m diameter cell) is comparable to the use of a perfect DEM, which exactly represents the ice sheet topography, on the same cell size. Interpolation by heterogeneous measurement-error-filtered kriging is significantly more accurate (on the order of 50% error reduction) than interpolation methods, which do not account for heterogeneous errors.
机译:卫星Altimetry已被广泛用于确定极性冰盖的表面高度变化。原始高度测量不规则地分布在空间和时间。网格表面高度变化通常通过重复的高度分析(RAA)和后续空间插值来导出高度变化估计。本文评估了与这两个步骤相关的方法学选择如何影响表面高度变化的准确性,并且通过正式的不确定性表示这种准确性的程度。在2010年12月和2014年1月在2014年12月至2014年1月之间获得的仿真环境,类似于格陵兰岛东北格陵兰的一个地区,测试了不同的局部地形建模方法和RAA的不同细胞尺寸和四种插值方法。在模拟的情况下,有利或不利的RAA的选择会影响结果的准确性大约6个因素,并且不同的精度水平被传播为插值的结果。对于RAA,如果可用非常精确的DEM,则校正外部数字高度模型(DEM)的本地地形是最好的,这并不总是如此。然而,最好的DEM独立的本地地形校正(3,000米直径内的九参数模型)可与使用完美的DEM的使用相当于同一电池尺寸的完美DEM。通过异构测量误差滤波的克里格的插值比插值方法显着更准确(约为50%的误差),这不考虑异质误差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号