首页> 外文期刊>Management science: Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences >The Only Prescription Is Transparency: The Effect of Charge-Price-Transparency Regulation on Healthcare Prices
【24h】

The Only Prescription Is Transparency: The Effect of Charge-Price-Transparency Regulation on Healthcare Prices

机译:唯一的处方是透明度:充电价格 - 透明度监管对医疗价格的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We examine the effect of charge-price-transparency regulation (PTR)-a common policy solution intended to curb rising healthcare costs-on hospitals' prices. We find that, although PTR does not affect payments or consumer search, it does cause hospitals to reduce charges by approximately 5%. The reputational costs of perceived overcharging appear to be one impetus for the reduction in charges, suggesting that certain stakeholders who are able to impose costs on hospitals are unaware that hospitals can decouple charges from payments. The ineffectiveness of PTR policies in reducing payments and the apparent inability of some stakeholders to realize this fact could explain why charge-transparency policies have been widely adopted with little opposition. Overall, our findings provide a cautionary note-transparency regulation focusing on an indicator that can be decoupled from the construct of interest might placate some stakeholders without actually solving the underlying problem.
机译:我们研究了充电价格 - 透明度监管(PTR)-A旨在遏制医疗保健成本上升的普通政策解决方案的效果。 我们发现,虽然PTR不会影响支付或消费者搜索,但它确实使医院减少了约5%的费用。 感知过度收费的声誉成本似乎是减少指控的推动力,这表明能够对医院施加成本的某些利益攸关方无意识别,即医院可以解耦支付费用。 PTR政策在减少支付和某些利益相关者的明显无法实现这一事实方面的无效可以解释为什么收取 - 透明度政策已被广泛的反对派被广泛采用。 总体而言,我们的调查结果提供了一个警示笔记 - 透明度调节,专注于可以从兴趣构建中解耦的指标可能会在没有实际解决潜在问题的情况下安抚一些利益相关者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号