...
首页> 外文期刊>Management science: Journal of the Institute of Management Sciences >Socially Beneficial Rationality: The Value of Strategic Farmers, Social Entrepreneurs, anti For-Profit Firms in Crop Planting Decisions
【24h】

Socially Beneficial Rationality: The Value of Strategic Farmers, Social Entrepreneurs, anti For-Profit Firms in Crop Planting Decisions

机译:社会有益的理性:战略农民,社会企业家,反利润公司在作物植物决策的价值

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The price fluctuation in agricultural markets is an obstacle to poverty reduction for small-scale farmers in developing countries. We build a microfoundation to study how farmers with heterogeneous production costs, under price fluctuations, make crop-planting decisions over time to maximize their individual welfare. We consider both strategic farmers, who rationally anticipate the near-future price as a basis for making planting decisions, and naive farmers, who shortsightedly react to the most recent crop price. The latter behavior may cause recurring overproduction or underproduction, which leads to price fluctuations. We find it important to cultivate a sufficient number of strategic farmers because their self-interested behavior alone, made possible by sufficient market information, can reduce price volatility and improve total social welfare. In the absence of strategic farmers, a well-designed preseason buyout contract, offered by a social entrepreneur or a for-profit firm to a fraction of contract farmers, brings benefit to farmers as well as to the firm itself. More strikingly, the contract not only equalizes the individual welfare in the long run among farmers of the same production cost, but it also reduces individual welfare disparity over time among farmers with heterogeneous costs regardless of whether they are contract farmers or not. On the other hand, a nonsocially optimal buyout contract may reflect a social entrepreneur's over-subsidy tendency or a for-profit firm's speculative incentive to mitigate but not eliminate the market price fluctuation, both preventing farmers from achieving the most welfare.
机译:农业市场的波动是发展中国家小型农民减贫的障碍。我们建立了一种微饱和,以研究农民在价格波动下如何运价的生产成本,使作物种植的决策随着时间的推移,以最大限度地提高他们的个人福利。我们考虑到战略农民,他合理地预测了近期价格作为制作种植决策的基础,以及幼稚的农民,他短暂对最近的作物价格做出反应。后一种行为可能导致重复生产过量生产或耗费生产率,从而导致价格波动。我们发现培养了足够数量的战略农民,因为他们独自的自私行为,可以通过足够的市场信息,可以降低价格波动,改善社会福利的自我影响。在没有战略农民的情况下,由社会企业家或营利性公司提供精心设计的季前赛买断合同,为一小部分合同农民带来了福利,以及公司本身。更引人注目的是,合同不仅在长期以来的农民中均衡了各个生产成本的人,而且在非均匀成本的农民中,它也会随着时间的推移减少了个体福利差异,而无论他们是否是合同的农民。另一方面,非本作最佳的收购合同可能反映社会企业家的过度补贴趋势或营利性公司的投机性激励,以防止农民实现最福利的市场价格波动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号