首页> 外文期刊>European neurology >Robotic-Assisted Gait Training Effect on Function and Gait Speed in Subacute and Chronic Stroke Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
【24h】

Robotic-Assisted Gait Training Effect on Function and Gait Speed in Subacute and Chronic Stroke Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

机译:机器人辅助步态对亚急性和慢性中风群体功能和步态速度的培训效应:随机对照试验的系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: The review is intended to provide the effectiveness of robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) for functional gait recovery in poststroke survivors through a systematic review and to provide evidence for gait speed improvements through the meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Summary: In this systematic review, PubMed, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, Science Direct, Science Robotics, Scopus, UpToDate, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, CINHAL, EMBASE, and EBSCO were reviewed to identify relevant RCTs. Articles included in the study were thoroughly examined by 2 independent reviewers. The included RCTs were having a PEDro score between 6 and 8 points. The initial database review yielded 1,371 studies and, following further screening; 9 studies finally were selected for systematic review and meta-analysis. Out of the 9 studies, 4 were on chronic stroke and 5 were on subacute stroke. The meta-analysis of gait speed showed an effect size value ranging between -0.91 and 0.64, with the total effect size of all the studies being -0.12. During subgroup analysis, the subacute stroke total effect size was identified as -0.48, and the chronic stroke total effect size was noted as 0.04. Meta-analysis revealed no significant differences between RAGT and conventional gait training (CGT). Key Messages: Our systematic review revealed that the RAGT application demonstrated a better or similar effect to that of CGT in a poststroke population. A meta-analysis of gait speed involving all the studies identified here indicated no significant differences between RAGT and CGT. However, the subanalysis of chronic stroke survivors showed a slight positive effect of RAGT on gait speed. (C) 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:审查旨在通过系统审查提供机器人辅助步态训练(RAG)在失败幸存者中进行功能步态培训的有效性,并通过在随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析中提供步态速度改善的证据。摘要:在这个系统审查中,PubMed,科学网站,Wiley在线图书馆,科学直接,科学机器人,Scopus,Uptodate,Medline,Google Scholar,Cinhal,Embase和EBSCO进行了审查,以确定相关的RCT。该研究中包含的文章被2名独立审稿人彻底审查。包括的RCT在6到8点之间的佩德罗分数。初始数据库审查产生了1,371项研究,并在进一步筛选之后; 9研究最终被选中进行系统审查和荟萃分析。在9项研究中,4种慢性中风,5例次次卒中。步态速度的Meta分析显示出效果尺寸值,范围为-0.91和0.64,所有研究的总效果大小为-0.12。在亚组分析期间,亚急性行程总效果大小被鉴定为-0.48,并且慢性冲程总效果大小指出为0.04。荟萃分析显示RA​​GT与常规步态培训(CGT)之间没有显着差异。关键消息:我们的系统审查显示,RAGT申请在失败群体中对CGT的效果更好或类似。涉及这里鉴定的所有研究的步态速度的荟萃分析表明RAGT和CGT之间没有显着差异。然而,慢性卒中幸存者的细胞分析表现出粗糙的速度对步态速度的微小积极作用。 (c)2019年S. Karger AG,巴塞尔

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号