...
首页> 外文期刊>BJU international >Add-on fesoterodine for residual storage symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder in men receiving α-blocker treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms
【24h】

Add-on fesoterodine for residual storage symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder in men receiving α-blocker treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms

机译:非索罗定补充治疗残留症状,提示接受α-受体阻滞剂治疗下尿路症状的男性膀胱过度活动

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Study Type - Therapy (RCT) Level of Evidence 1b What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Male lower urinary tract symptoms are often attributed to bladder outlet obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia and treated with drugs targeting the prostate. However, many men with storage lower urinary tract symptoms may not respond adequately to these agents. Antimuscarinics, with or without an α-blocker, may be effective for the treatment of the storage symptoms of overactive bladder in some men. Flexible-dose fesoterodine as an add-on treatment significantly improved urinary frequency and symptom bother, but not urgency episodes (primary endpoint), versus add-on placebo and was well tolerated in men with persistent overactive bladder symptoms despite receiving α-blocker. OBJECTIVE To evaluate flexible-dose fesoterodine vs placebo in men with persistent overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms despite receiving α-blocker treatment SUBJECTS AND METHODS This was a double-blind, 12-week, flexible-dose trial. Men with persistent storage symptoms (≥8 micturitions and ≥3 urgency episodes per 24 h) after receiving an α-blocker for ≥6 weeks were randomized to add-on fesoterodine 4 mg or placebo, with optional dose escalation to 8 mg at week 4 and reduction back to 4 mg at week 8 (or matching placebo adjustments). Subjects completed 3-day diaries, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q), Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC), and Urgency Perception Scale (UPS) at baseline and weeks 4 and 12. RESULTS A total of 943 men were randomized and received at least one dose of study treatment (fesoterodine, n= 471; placebo, n= 472). Among these, 251 (53%) in the fesoterodine group and 300 (64%) in the placebo group requested dose escalation at week 4 and 35 (7%) and 15 (3%) requested dose reduction at week 8. Changes from baseline to week 12 in urgency episodes (primary endpoint) in the fesoterodine (-3.2) and placebo (-2.9) groups were not significantly different (P= 0.196), but improvements in micturitions (P= 0.009) and OAB-q symptom bother score (P= 0.007) were significantly greater with fesoterodine. At week 4, significantly greater improvements in micturitions (P= 0.006), severe urgency episodes (P= 0.006), IPSS storage score (P= 0.022), OAB-q symptom bother score (P= 0.004), and OAB-q health-related quality of life (P= 0.041), but not urgency episodes (P= 0.062), were observed with add-on fesoterodine. Dry mouth (fesoterodine, 21%; placebo, 6%) and constipation (fesoterodine, 6%; placebo, 2%) were the most common adverse events. Dysuria and urinary retention were reported by 3% and 2% of subjects, respectively, in the fesoterodine add-on group vs 1% and <1% of subjects, respectively in the placebo add-on group. One subject in each group had acute urinary retention requiring catheterization. CONCLUSIONS Flexible-dose fesoterodine was well tolerated as an add-on treatment in men with persistent storage symptoms. Changes in urgency episodes at week 12 (primary endpoint) and many secondary endpoints were not significantly different between fesoterodine and placebo add-on treatment; however, improvements in frequency and symptom bother were significantly greater with fesoterodine. These data suggest that there remains a limited understanding of the optimal evaluation and treatment of men with LUTS.
机译:研究类型-治疗(RCT)的证据水平1b关于该主题的知识是什么?该研究增加了什么?男性下尿路症状通常归因于良性前列腺增生继发的膀胱出口梗阻,并用靶向前列腺的药物治疗。但是,许多患有下尿路症状的男性可能对这些药物没有足够的反应。抗毒蕈碱类药物(带有或不带有α阻滞剂)可能有效地治疗了某些男性膀胱过度活动症的储存症状。与添加安慰剂相比,软剂量非索罗定作为附加治疗显着改善了尿频和症状困扰,但没有尿急发作(主要终点),并且在患有持续性膀胱过度活动症状的男性中,尽管接受了α受体阻滞剂,但耐受性良好。目的评估尽管接受α-受体阻滞剂治疗但患有持续性膀胱过度活动症(OAB)症状的男性的柔性剂量非索罗定与安慰剂的关系受试者和方法这是一项双盲,为期12周的柔性剂量试验。在接受α受体阻滞剂治疗≥6周后出现持续性存储症状(≥8排尿且每24小时≥3尿急发作)的男性被随机分配给非索非定4 mg或安慰剂,第4周剂量可选增加至8 mg并在第8周减少至4 mg(或相应的安慰剂调整)。受试者在基线以及第4周和第12周完成了3天的日记,国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS),膀胱过度活动症问卷(OAB-q),患者对膀胱疾病的感知(PPBC)和紧急感知量表(UPS)。总共943名男性被随机分配并接受至少一剂研究治疗药物(非索罗定,n = 471;安慰剂,n = 472)。在这些药物中,非索罗定组中的251(53%)和安慰剂组中的300(64%)在第4周要求增加剂量,而35(7%)和15(3%)在第8周要求降低剂量。非索罗定(-3.2)和安慰剂(-2.9)组的尿急发作(主要终点)至第12周无显着差异(P = 0.196),但排尿改善(P = 0.009)和OAB-q症状困扰评分非索罗定组(P = 0.007)明显更高。在第4周时,排尿(P = 0.006),严重尿急发作(P = 0.006),IPSS储存评分(P = 0.022),OAB-q症状困扰评分(P = 0.004)和OAB-q健康显着改善联合使用非索罗定可观察到与生命有关的生活质量(P = 0.041),而未出现尿急发作(P = 0.062)。口干(非索罗定,21%;安慰剂,6%)和便秘(非索罗定,6%;安慰剂,2%)是最常见的不良事件。非索罗定补充组中分别有3%和2%的受试者报告排尿困难和尿retention留,而安慰剂组则分别为1%和<1%。每组中有一名受试者患有急性尿retention留,需要进行导管插入术。结论对于患有持续性存储症状的男性,软剂量非索罗定可作为附加治疗剂被很好地耐受。非索罗定和安慰剂联合治疗在第12周(主要终点)和许多次要终点的尿急发作变化没有显着差异。然而,非索罗定在频率和症状困扰方面的改善明显更大。这些数据表明,对LUTS男性的最佳评估和治疗的了解仍然有限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号