...
首页> 外文期刊>Food Ethics >A Wicked Fairy in the Woods - how would People alter their Animal Product Consumption if they were affected by the Consequences of their Choices
【24h】

A Wicked Fairy in the Woods - how would People alter their Animal Product Consumption if they were affected by the Consequences of their Choices

机译:树林里的一个邪恶的童话 - 如果受他们选择后果的影响,人们将如何改变他们的动物产品消费

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The ambivalence of human-animal-relationships culminates in our eating habits; most people disapprove of factory farming, but most animal products that are consumed come from factory farming. While psychology and sociology offer several theoretical explanations for this phenomenon our study presents an experimental approach: an attempt to challenge people's attitude by confronting them with the animals' perspective of the consumption process. We confronted our participants with a fictional scenario that could result in them being turned into an animal. In the scenario, a wicked fairy forces them to choose a ticket. Depending on their choice of ticket they have equal chances of becoming a human being with a certain consumption behaviour (meat eater,organic eater, vegetarian, vegan) or, correspondingly, becoming a certain kind of animal (factory farmed meat animal, organically farmed meat animal, animal for dairy/egg production, free living animal). Our results indicate a strong discrepancy betweenpeople's actual consumption habits (mostly regular meat eaters) and their choices in the experiment (strong preferences for the organic or vegan life style). The data reveal a broad spectrum of explanations for people's decisions in the experiment. We investigated the influence of four different factors on the participant's choices in addition to reasons they gave as open-ended answers. Correspondingly, different coping strategies to overcome the tension (cognitive dissonance) between real-life consumption choices and attitudes towards nonhuman animals could be detected. Furthermore, many participants indicated a lack of knowledge concerning living conditions in farming but also concerning capacities and properties of nonhuman animals.
机译:人类 - 动物关系的矛盾促使我们的饮食习惯中;大多数人不赞成工厂养殖,但大多数被消耗的动物产品来自工厂养殖。虽然心理学和社会学为这一现象提供了几种理论解释,但我们的研究提出了一种实验方法:试图通过对这些动物的消费过程的观点面对来挑战人们的态度。我们与我们的参与者面临着一个虚构的情景,可能导致他们变成动物。在情景中,一个邪恶的童话迫使他们选择一张票。取决于他们选择的机票,他们有平等的机会,成为一个人类的消费行为(肉食者,有机食店,素食主义者,素食主义者)或相应地成为某种动物(工厂养殖肉类动物,有机养殖的肉类动物,动物为乳制品/鸡蛋生产,自由生活)。我们的结果表明,在实验中的实际消费习惯(主要是常规肉类食物)和他们在实验中的选择(对有机或素食主义者生活方式的强烈偏好)之间存在强烈的差异。数据显示了对人们在实验中的决定的广泛解释。除了他们作为开放式答案的原因,我们还调查了四种不同因素对参与者选择的影响。相应地,可以检测到不同的应对策略,以克服真生消费选择与非人动物态度之间的张力(认知不分散)。此外,许多参与者表明缺乏有关农业生活条件的知识,还涉及非人动物的能力和性质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号