首页> 外文期刊>Future oncology >The NAME trial: a direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus Metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer
【24h】

The NAME trial: a direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus Metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer

机译:名称试验:直接比较古典口头脐带与乳腺癌中的度量乳腺癌

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is in general given in cycles of maximum tolerated doses to potentially maximize the therapeutic outcome. However, when compared with targeted therapies for MBC, conventional and dose intensified chemotherapy has caused only modest survival benefits during the recent decades, often compromising the quality of life considerably. Navelbine is an antineoplastic agent that has shown efficacy in the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including breast cancer. Early clinical trials involving both breast cancer and lung cancer patients suggest that metronomic dosing of Navelbine might be at least as effective as classical administration (once weekly, etc.). The NAME trial compares these two strategies of Navelbine administration in MBC patients.
机译:用于转移性乳腺癌的化疗(MBC)通常在最大耐受剂量的循环中给出,以潜在地最大化治疗结果。 然而,与MBC的靶向疗法相比,常规和剂量增强化疗在近几十年来造成了适度的生存效益,往往损害了生活质量。 Navelebine是一种抗肿瘤剂,其在治疗各种癌症类型的疗效,包括乳腺癌。 涉及乳腺癌和肺癌患者的早期临床试验表明,NavelBine的群治给药可能至少与经典管理(每周一次)一样有效。 该名称试验比较MBC患者中的脐带施用的这两种策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号