首页> 外文期刊>Gastroenterology >Timing Affects Measurement of Portal Pressure Gradient After Placement of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts in Patients With Portal Hypertension
【24h】

Timing Affects Measurement of Portal Pressure Gradient After Placement of Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunts in Patients With Portal Hypertension

机译:在门静脉高压患者中放置后节内肝内portoSysysic分流后的搬运区压力梯度的测量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND & AIMS: A reduction in portal pressure gradient (PPG) to <12 mm Hg after placement of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) correlates with the absence of further bleeding or ascites at follow-up examinations of patients with cirrhosis. The PPG is usually measured immediately after placement of the TIPS, when different circumstances can affect PPG values, which could affect determination of risk for decompensation. We investigated variations in PPG measurements collected at different time points after TIPS, aiming to identify a time point after which PPG values were best maintained. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 155 consecutive patients with severe complications of portal hypertension who received placement of TIPS from January 2008 through October 2015; patients were followed until March 2016. We compared PPG values measured at different time points and under different conditions: immediately after placement of TIPS (immediate PPG); at least 24 hours after placement to TIPS into hemodynamically stable patients, without sedation (early PPG); and again 1 month after TIPS placement (late PPG). RESULTS: The immediate PPG differed significantly from the early PPG, regardless of whether the TIPS was placed using general anesthesia (8.5 +/- 3.5 mm Hg vs 10 +/- 3.5 mm Hg; P = .015) or deep sedation (12 +/- 4 mm Hg vs 10.5 +/- 4 mm Hg; P < .001). In considering the 12 mm Hg threshold, concordance between immediate PPG and early PPG values was poor. However, there was no significant difference between mean early PPG and late PPG values (8.5 +/- 2.5 mm Hg vs 8 +/- 3 mm Hg), or between proportions of patients with early PPG vs late PPG values < 12 mm Hg threshold. Maintenance of a PPG value < 12 mm Hg during the follow-up period was associated with a lower risk of recurrent or de novo variceal bleeding or ascites (hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.04 0.27; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective study of patients with PPG values measured at different time points after TIPS placement, we found measurements of PPG in awake, hemodynamically stable patients at least 24 hours after TIPS to be the best maintained values. Our findings support the concept that PPG value < 12 mm Hg after TIPS placement is associated with reduced risk of bleeding and ascites.
机译:背景和AIMS:在放置肝硬化患者的后续检查时,在静脉内部肝内雌激酶分流器(提示)中,在放置后颈内静脉内体系分流(提示)后,门骨压力梯度(PPG)降低到<12mm的Hg。当不同的情况会影响PPG值时,通常在放置尖端后立即测量PPG,这可能影响对失控风险的影响。我们在提示之后调查了在不同时间点收集的PPG测量的变化,旨在识别最佳维护PPG值之后的时间点。方法:我们对155名连续并发症的患者进行了回顾性研究,该患者的重症并发症于2008年1月至2015年10月的提示;患者持续到2016年3月。我们比较了在不同时间点和不同条件下测量的PPG值:在放置提示后立即(立即PPG);在放置到血流动力学稳定的患者中至少24小时,没有镇静(早期ppg);并在提示放置后1个月(晚期PPG)。结果:无论使用全身麻醉(8.5 +/- 3.5 mm Hg; 10 +/- 3.5 mm hg; p = .015)还是深镇静(12 + / - 4 mm Hg vs 10.5 +/- 4 mm hg; p <.001)。在考虑12 mm Hg阈值时,即时PPG与早期PPG值之间的一致性差。然而,平均pPG和晚期PPG值之间没有显着差异(8.5 +/- 2.5mm Hg Vs 8 +/- 3 mm Hg),或者在早期PPG的患者比例之间的比例VS后PPG值<12 mm Hg阈值之间。在随访期间维持PPG值<12mm Hg的较低的复发性或Novo variceal出血或腹水的风险较低有关(危险比,0.11; 95%置信区间,0.04 0.27; p <.001)。结论:在提示放置后在不同时间点测量的PPG值患者的回顾性研究中,我们发现在醒着的血流动力学稳定的患者中的测量值,至少24小时以后是最好的维持值。我们的研究结果支持PPG值<12 mm Hg的概念,提示放置后与出血和腹水的风险降低相关。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Gastroenterology》 |2017年第6期|共8页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Barcelona Barcelona Hepat Hemodynam Lab Inst Invest Biomed August Pi &

    Sunyer Liver Unit;

    Univ Barcelona Barcelona Hepat Hemodynam Lab Inst Invest Biomed August Pi &

    Sunyer Liver Unit;

    Univ Barcelona Barcelona Hepat Hemodynam Lab Inst Invest Biomed August Pi &

    Sunyer Liver Unit;

    Univ Barcelona Barcelona Hepat Hemodynam Lab Inst Invest Biomed August Pi &

    Sunyer Liver Unit;

    Hosp Clin Barcelona Ctr Diagnost Imatge Barcelona Spain;

    Univ Barcelona Dept Anesthesiol Hosp Clin Inst Invest Biomed August Pi &

    Sunyer Barcelona Spain;

    Hosp Clin Barcelona Biostat &

    Data Management Core Facil Inst Invest Biomed August Pi &

    Sunyer;

    Univ Barcelona Barcelona Hepat Hemodynam Lab Inst Invest Biomed August Pi &

    Sunyer Liver Unit;

    Univ Barcelona Barcelona Hepat Hemodynam Lab Inst Invest Biomed August Pi &

    Sunyer Liver Unit;

    Univ Barcelona Barcelona Hepat Hemodynam Lab Inst Invest Biomed August Pi &

    Sunyer Liver Unit;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 消化系及腹部疾病;
  • 关键词

    Portal Pressure Measurement; Portal Hypertension; Liver Cirrhosis;

    机译:门户压力测量;门静脉高压;肝硬化;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号